Olympus 7010 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS
94 Imaging
35 Features
18 Overall
28
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Olympus 7010 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 145g - 98 x 56 x 26mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Alternate Name is mju 7010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus 7010 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Olympus 7010 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are sold by Olympus. The image resolution of the 7010 (12MP) and the TG-630 iHS (12MP) is relatively comparable and they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe 7010 was launched 4 years before the TG-630 iHS which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a in depth comparison, below is a concise summation of how the 7010 matches up against the TG-630 iHS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus 7010 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus 7010 and Olympus TG-630 iHS. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus 7010 Gallery and Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 7010 over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
| 7010 | TG-630 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Olympus 7010
| TG-630 iHS | 7010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | July 2009 | More modern by 42 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 7010 and Olympus TG-630 iHS
| 7010 | TG-630 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus 7010 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus 7010 provides exterior dimensions of 98mm x 56mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") having a weight of 145 grams (0.32 lbs) while the Olympus TG-630 iHS has measurements of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus 7010 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select at that time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the 7010 against the TG-630 iHS.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 7010 and TG-630 iHS is 94 and 94 respectively.
Olympus 7010 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to envision the contrast in sensor sizes merely by going through specifications. The image underneath may give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the 7010 and TG-630 iHS.
Plainly, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the identical MP and you should expect comparable quality of files though you may want to factor the production date of the cameras into account. The more aged 7010 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus 7010 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus 7010 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 7010 | Olympus TG-630 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus 7010 | Olympus TG-630 iHS |
| Also referred to as | mju 7010 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2009-07-22 | 2013-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 145g (0.32 lb) | 167g (0.37 lb) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 56 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 pictures |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $200 | $200 |
