Olympus 7010 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
94 Imaging
34 Features
18 Overall
27
90 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Olympus 7010 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 145g - 98 x 56 x 26mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Other Name is mju 7010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
- Updated by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Olympus 7010 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Olympus 7010 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the 7010 (12MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe 7010 was launched 5 years prior to the WG-4 GPS and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the 7010 matches up against the WG-4 GPS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus 7010 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus 7010 & Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The complete galleries are available at Olympus 7010 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 7010 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| 7010 | WG-4 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Olympus 7010
| WG-4 GPS | 7010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 | July 2009 | More recent by 55 months | |
| Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 7010 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| 7010 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 7010 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus 7010 provides outside measurements of 98mm x 56mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") and a weight of 145 grams (0.32 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has specifications of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Check the Olympus 7010 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the 7010 against the WG-4 GPS.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the 7010 and WG-4 GPS is 94 and 90 respectively.
Olympus 7010 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to picture the contrast in sensor measurements only by looking through specs. The graphic here will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the 7010 and WG-4 GPS.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to result in extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The older 7010 will be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus 7010 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus 7010 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 7010 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus Stylus 7010 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
| Also called | mju 7010 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2009-07-22 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 145g (0.32 pounds) | 235g (0.52 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 56 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 pictures |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-42B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $200 | $210 |