Olympus 7010 vs Sony TX200V
94 Imaging
34 Features
18 Overall
27


96 Imaging
41 Features
48 Overall
43
Olympus 7010 vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 145g - 98 x 56 x 26mm
- Released July 2009
- Alternative Name is mju 7010
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Introduced January 2012

Olympus 7010 vs Sony TX200V Overview
Following is a thorough overview of the Olympus 7010 and Sony TX200V, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the 7010 (12MP) and TX200V (18MP) but they come with the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

The 7010 was announced 3 years earlier than the TX200V which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus 7010 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX200V being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving through a full comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the 7010 matches up against the TX200V in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus 7010 vs Sony TX200V Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus 7010 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus 7010 Gallery & Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 7010 over the Sony TX200V
7010 | TX200V |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Olympus 7010
TX200V | 7010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2012 | ![]() | July 2009 | More modern by 30 months |
Display dimension | 3.3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.6") |
Display resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+1000k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 7010 and Sony TX200V
7010 | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus 7010 vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus 7010 provides outside dimensions of 98mm x 56mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") and a weight of 145 grams (0.32 lbs) whilst the Sony TX200V has proportions of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") along with a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Compare the Olympus 7010 and Sony TX200V in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the 7010 vs the TX200V.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the 7010 and TX200V is 94 and 96 respectively.

Olympus 7010 vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be difficult to see the difference between sensor sizes just by going over specs. The image here may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the 7010 and TX200V.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Sony TX200V to offer you extra detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics much more aggressively. The more aged 7010 is going to be behind in sensor technology.

Olympus 7010 vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 7010 vs Sony TX200V Specifications
Olympus Stylus 7010 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Stylus 7010 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
Alternate name | mju 7010 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Released | 2009-07-22 | 2012-01-30 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 18MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4896 x 3672 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 64 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focus range | 10cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3.3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | - | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 2 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m | 3.10 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 145g (0.32 lbs) | 129g (0.28 lbs) |
Dimensions | 98 x 56 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 photographs |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-42B | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $200 | $500 |