Olympus 7030 vs Ricoh WG-20
95 Imaging
36 Features
27 Overall
32
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97313/9731330fcb04886d79572856af019d157e2f820f" alt="Olympus Stylus 7030 front Olympus Stylus 7030 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f6b9/0f6b92e8e7b3c6a64e703e8b995daab652fd7cfe" alt="Ricoh WG-20 front Ricoh WG-20 front"
93 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
Olympus 7030 vs Ricoh WG-20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 140g - 93 x 56 x 26mm
- Launched January 2010
- Alternative Name is mju 7030
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 164g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Released February 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus 7030 vs Ricoh WG-20 Overview
In this article, we will be looking at the Olympus 7030 and Ricoh WG-20, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the 7030 (14MP) and the WG-20 (14MP) is pretty close and they come with the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The 7030 was brought out 5 years before the WG-20 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the 7030 scores against the WG-20 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus 7030 vs Ricoh WG-20 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus 7030 & Ricoh WG-20. The entire galleries are available at Olympus 7030 Gallery & Ricoh WG-20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 7030 over the Ricoh WG-20
7030 | WG-20 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-20 over the Olympus 7030
WG-20 | 7030 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2014 | ![]() | January 2010 | Fresher by 49 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing |
Common features in the Olympus 7030 and Ricoh WG-20
7030 | WG-20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equivalent screen sizing |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | No Touch screen |
Olympus 7030 vs Ricoh WG-20 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera, you are going to need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus 7030 provides exterior dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") and a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-20 has specifications of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 164 grams (0.36 lbs).
Check the Olympus 7030 and Ricoh WG-20 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the 7030 compared to the WG-20.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0562/f05627ff7cbdc50ad0229d457ee1d0954359fa79" alt="Olympus 7030 vs Ricoh WG-20 size comparison Olympus 7030 vs Ricoh WG-20 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 7030 and WG-20 is 95 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1ffae/1ffae939d26f3b121736136666a48933e9b55ca2" alt="Olympus 7030 vs Ricoh WG-20 top view buttons comparison Olympus 7030 vs Ricoh WG-20 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus 7030 vs Ricoh WG-20 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizing simply by looking through technical specs. The visual below should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the 7030 and WG-20.
As you can tell, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same resolution and you can expect comparable quality of photographs however you will want to consider the age of the cameras into account. The older 7030 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/edca9/edca9e282df27e347055e43fd9a93a8b0c8da253" alt="Olympus 7030 vs Ricoh WG-20 sensor size comparison Olympus 7030 vs Ricoh WG-20 sensor size comparison"
Olympus 7030 vs Ricoh WG-20 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/229ce/229ce5deef7aa526b75cd5f82a0e6a8f5fcad0a6" alt="Olympus 7030 vs Ricoh WG-20 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus 7030 vs Ricoh WG-20 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus 7030 vs Ricoh WG-20 Specifications
Olympus Stylus 7030 | Ricoh WG-20 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus Stylus 7030 | Ricoh WG-20 |
Otherwise known as | mju 7030 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Launched | 2010-01-07 | 2014-02-05 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing range | 2cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.70 m | 4.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30p, 15p), 640 x 480 (30p, 15p), 320 x 240 (30p, 15p) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 140g (0.31 lb) | 164g (0.36 lb) |
Dimensions | 93 x 56 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 260 photos |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SC/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $179 | $370 |