Olympus 7030 vs Ricoh WG-70
95 Imaging
36 Features
27 Overall
32
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
Olympus 7030 vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 140g - 93 x 56 x 26mm
- Launched January 2010
- Additionally referred to as mju 7030
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed February 2020
- Refreshed by Ricoh WG-80
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus 7030 vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Olympus 7030 vs Ricoh WG-70, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the 7030 (14MP) and the WG-70 (16MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe 7030 was brought out 11 years earlier than the WG-70 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a full comparison, here is a simple summation of how the 7030 scores versus the WG-70 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus 7030 vs Ricoh WG-70 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus 7030 & Ricoh WG-70. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus 7030 Gallery & Ricoh WG-70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 7030 over the Ricoh WG-70
| 7030 | WG-70 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Olympus 7030
| WG-70 | 7030 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2020 | January 2010 | More modern by 122 months | |
| Manual focus | Dial precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus 7030 and Ricoh WG-70
| 7030 | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 2.7" | Same screen dimensions | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | The same screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | No Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 7030 vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 7030 provides outside dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") with a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-70 has dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Look at the Olympus 7030 vs Ricoh WG-70 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the 7030 versus the WG-70.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 7030 and WG-70 is 95 and 91 respectively.
Olympus 7030 vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to see the difference between sensor sizes simply by reading through a spec sheet. The picture below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the 7030 and WG-70.
As you can see, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Ricoh WG-70 to give more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots way more aggressively. The more aged 7030 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus 7030 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus 7030 vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 7030 | Ricoh WG-70 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus Stylus 7030 | Ricoh WG-70 |
| Alternative name | mju 7030 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2010-01-07 | 2020-02-04 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 2cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.70 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 140 gr (0.31 lb) | 193 gr (0.43 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 56 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photographs |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SC/SDHC, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $179 | $280 |