Clicky

Olympus 7030 vs Samsung SL202

Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
27
Overall
32
Olympus Stylus 7030 front
 
Samsung SL202 front
Portability
94
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26

Olympus 7030 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs

Olympus 7030
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 140g - 93 x 56 x 26mm
  • Launched January 2010
  • Also referred to as mju 7030
Samsung SL202
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
  • 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
  • Revealed February 2009
  • Additionally Known as PL50
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus 7030 vs Samsung SL202 Overview

Let's look more closely at the Olympus 7030 versus Samsung SL202, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the 7030 (14MP) and SL202 (10MP) but they possess the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The 7030 was launched 11 months later than the SL202 so they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before diving straight into a complete comparison, below is a brief overview of how the 7030 grades versus the SL202 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus 7030 over the Samsung SL202

 7030 SL202 
RevealedJanuary 2010February 2009Fresher by 11 months

Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Olympus 7030

 SL202 7030 

Common features in the Olympus 7030 and Samsung SL202

 7030 SL202 
Focus manually Lack of manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension2.7"2.7"Identical screen measurement
Screen resolution230k230kSame screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither features Touch friendly screen

Olympus 7030 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to carry your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 7030 enjoys outside dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") with a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL202 has dimensions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).

Check out the Olympus 7030 versus Samsung SL202 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the 7030 versus the SL202.

Olympus 7030 vs Samsung SL202 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the 7030 and SL202 is 95 and 94 respectively.

Olympus 7030 vs Samsung SL202 top view buttons comparison

Olympus 7030 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison

Usually, its difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizing purely by looking through a spec sheet. The visual underneath should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the 7030 and SL202.

Clearly, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Olympus 7030 to provide you with extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The newer 7030 will have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus 7030 vs Samsung SL202 sensor size comparison

Olympus 7030 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus 7030 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus 7030 Portrait photography highlights
Samsung SL202 Portrait photography highlights
28
decent MP (14MP)
lack of manual focus
manual mode not available
external flash not possible
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
25
features face detection autofocus
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not available
cannot use external flash
low megapixels (10MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus 7030 as a Street photography camera
Samsung SL202 as a Street photography camera
57
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
47
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus 7030
Sports photography with Samsung SL202
39
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
16
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus 7030 Travel photography information
Samsung SL202 Travel photography information
65
decent MP (14MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (28mm)
no Time Lapse recording
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
57
built-in flash
rather wide (28mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
low megapixels (10MP)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus 7030 Landscape photography highlights
Samsung SL202 Landscape photography highlights
37
pretty wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14MP)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
manual mode not available
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
no Time Lapse recording
27
rather wide (28mm)
focusing manually not possible
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
manual mode not available
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
does not have Time Lapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 7030 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung SL202 as a Vlogging camera
29
pretty wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
low quality video (640 x 480 resolution)
no mic socket
27
rather wide (28mm)
features face detection autofocus
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pxls)
does not have external mic jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus 7030 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus 7030 and Samsung SL202
 Olympus Stylus 7030Samsung SL202
General Information
Make Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus Stylus 7030 Samsung SL202
Also called as mju 7030 PL50
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2010-01-07 2009-02-17
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic III -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 16:9 and 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 4288 x 3216 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 1600 1600
Min native ISO 64 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-196mm (7.0x) 28-102mm (3.6x)
Largest aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/2.8-5.7
Macro focus range 2cm 5cm
Crop factor 5.9 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7" 2.7"
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 8 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/1500 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 1.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 5.70 m 4.60 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 140 grams (0.31 lbs) 168 grams (0.37 lbs)
Dimensions 93 x 56 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 seconds) Yes
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SC/SDHC, Internal SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at launch $179 $140