Olympus 7030 vs Samsung WB35F
95 Imaging
36 Features
27 Overall
32
93 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
Olympus 7030 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 140g - 93 x 56 x 26mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Other Name is mju 7030
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced January 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus 7030 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Here, we will be looking at the Olympus 7030 vs Samsung WB35F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the 7030 (14MP) and the WB35F (16MP) is relatively similar and both cameras boast the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe 7030 was introduced 5 years before the WB35F which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the 7030 grades against the WB35F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus 7030 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus 7030 & Samsung WB35F. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus 7030 Gallery & Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 7030 over the Samsung WB35F
| 7030 | WB35F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Olympus 7030
| WB35F | 7030 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2014 | January 2010 | More modern by 48 months | |
| Focus manually | More accurate focus |
Common features in the Olympus 7030 and Samsung WB35F
| 7030 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 2.7" | Same screen size | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | The same screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 7030 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus 7030 enjoys outer dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") along with a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs) and the Samsung WB35F has proportions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Olympus 7030 vs Samsung WB35F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the 7030 against the WB35F.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the 7030 and WB35F is 95 and 93 respectively.
Olympus 7030 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizes simply by going over a spec sheet. The pic here may provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the 7030 and WB35F.
As you can see, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Samsung WB35F to offer more detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs way more aggressively. The more aged 7030 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus 7030 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus 7030 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 7030 | Samsung WB35F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus 7030 | Samsung WB35F |
| Otherwise known as | mju 7030 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2010-01-07 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 and 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focusing range | 2cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.70 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 140g (0.31 lb) | 194g (0.43 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 56 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SC/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $179 | $130 |