Olympus 7040 vs Olympus TG-860
95 Imaging
36 Features
31 Overall
34
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6473/b6473b5865836cc6f780f02e1794663604ffc69e" alt="Olympus Stylus 7040 front Olympus Stylus 7040 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/042ab/042ab9bda5359b24c15525e105c8dbb85792e213" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front"
91 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
Olympus 7040 vs Olympus TG-860 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 144g - 95 x 56 x 26mm
- Released January 2010
- Also referred to as mju 7040
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Released February 2015
- Later Model is Olympus TG-870
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus 7040 vs Olympus TG-860 Overview
Here, we are looking at the Olympus 7040 and Olympus TG-860, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof and both are built by Olympus. The resolution of the 7040 (14MP) and the TG-860 (16MP) is fairly close and both cameras have the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The 7040 was unveiled 6 years before the TG-860 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus 7040 being a Compact camera and the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving into a detailed comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the 7040 grades versus the TG-860 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus 7040 vs Olympus TG-860 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus 7040 and Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860. The full galleries are provided at Olympus 7040 Gallery and Olympus TG-860 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 7040 over the Olympus TG-860
7040 | TG-860 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Olympus 7040
TG-860 | 7040 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2015 | ![]() | January 2010 | More modern by 61 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 7040 and Olympus TG-860
7040 | TG-860 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Olympus 7040 vs Olympus TG-860 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 7040 features exterior measurements of 95mm x 56mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 144 grams (0.32 lbs) while the Olympus TG-860 has dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") having a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus 7040 and Olympus TG-860 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use at the time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the 7040 vs the TG-860.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8668c/8668c33819286eeede84e431751a16c1c13361ab" alt="Olympus 7040 vs Olympus TG-860 size comparison Olympus 7040 vs Olympus TG-860 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 7040 and TG-860 is 95 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ea868/ea868f225bc719a8657c00ca6a5c0eeee12dfa43" alt="Olympus 7040 vs Olympus TG-860 top view buttons comparison Olympus 7040 vs Olympus TG-860 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus 7040 vs Olympus TG-860 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to imagine the gap in sensor sizes just by viewing a spec sheet. The pic here will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the 7040 and TG-860.
Clearly, both cameras feature the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Olympus TG-860 to render extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images way more aggressively. The more aged 7040 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f253/6f253b5f23ba39cc5a0d4bc51e39fca6d1acb57e" alt="Olympus 7040 vs Olympus TG-860 sensor size comparison Olympus 7040 vs Olympus TG-860 sensor size comparison"
Olympus 7040 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82ac1/82ac1bdce833885a9a2c55efd911d9609ed5389e" alt="Olympus 7040 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus 7040 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus 7040 vs Olympus TG-860 Specifications
Olympus Stylus 7040 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus Stylus 7040 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 |
Also called as | mju 7040 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Released | 2010-01-07 | 2015-02-06 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.7 |
Macro focus range | 2cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 7.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.70 m | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Yes |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 144 gr (0.32 lb) | 224 gr (0.49 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 56 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 pictures |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SC/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $299 | $279 |