Olympus 7040 vs Ricoh CX2
95 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
Olympus 7040 vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 144g - 95 x 56 x 26mm
- Released January 2010
- Also Known as mju 7040
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed August 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus 7040 vs Ricoh CX2 Overview
The following is a complete overview of the Olympus 7040 and Ricoh CX2, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the 7040 (14MP) and CX2 (9MP) but they come with the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe 7040 was manufactured 5 months after the CX2 which means that they are of a similar age. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a comprehensive comparison, below is a short introduction of how the 7040 scores vs the CX2 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus 7040 vs Ricoh CX2 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus 7040 & Ricoh CX2. The entire galleries are available at Olympus 7040 Gallery & Ricoh CX2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 7040 over the Ricoh CX2
| 7040 | CX2 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Olympus 7040
| CX2 | 7040 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 7040 and Ricoh CX2
| 7040 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2010 |  | August 2009 | Similar age |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 7040 vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus 7040 features exterior measurements of 95mm x 56mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") along with a weight of 144 grams (0.32 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX2 has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus 7040 and Ricoh CX2 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the 7040 against the CX2.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the 7040 and CX2 is 95 and 93 respectively.
Olympus 7040 vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by reading a spec sheet. The picture below will provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the 7040 and CX2.
Clearly, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Olympus 7040 to offer you extra detail due to its extra 5MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs much more aggressively.
Olympus 7040 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus 7040 vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 7040 | Ricoh CX2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus 7040 | Ricoh CX2 |
| Also called as | mju 7040 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2010-01-07 | 2009-08-20 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 9 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.70 m | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 144g (0.32 lbs) | 185g (0.41 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 56 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SC/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $299 | $341 |
