Clicky

Olympus 7040 vs Ricoh CX5

Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
31
Overall
34
Olympus Stylus 7040 front
 
Ricoh CX5 front
Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
35
Overall
34

Olympus 7040 vs Ricoh CX5 Key Specs

Olympus 7040
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 144g - 95 x 56 x 26mm
  • Introduced January 2010
  • Additionally Known as mju 7040
Ricoh CX5
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
  • Announced July 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus 7040 vs Ricoh CX5 Overview

Here is a extended review of the Olympus 7040 and Ricoh CX5, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the 7040 (14MP) and CX5 (10MP) but they come with the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The 7040 was revealed 18 months earlier than the CX5 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before diving through a more detailed comparison, below is a brief overview of how the 7040 grades against the CX5 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus 7040 over the Ricoh CX5

 7040 CX5 

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX5 over the Olympus 7040

 CX5 7040 
AnnouncedJuly 2011January 2010Fresher by 18 months
Focus manually Dial accurate focus
Display resolution920k230kCrisper display (+690k dot)

Common features in the Olympus 7040 and Ricoh CX5

 7040 CX5 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display measurements
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch display Neither comes with Touch display

Olympus 7040 vs Ricoh CX5 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to carry your camera, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 7040 comes with physical dimensions of 95mm x 56mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") with a weight of 144 grams (0.32 lbs) and the Ricoh CX5 has dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).

Examine the Olympus 7040 and Ricoh CX5 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the 7040 compared to the CX5.

Olympus 7040 vs Ricoh CX5 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the 7040 and CX5 is 95 and 92 respectively.

Olympus 7040 vs Ricoh CX5 top view buttons comparison

Olympus 7040 vs Ricoh CX5 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is very hard to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing merely by going over specifications. The visual here might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the 7040 and CX5.

To sum up, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Olympus 7040 to deliver extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images far more aggressively. The older 7040 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus 7040 vs Ricoh CX5 sensor size comparison

Olympus 7040 vs Ricoh CX5 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus 7040 vs Ricoh CX5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus 7040 Portrait photography advice
Ricoh CX5 Portrait photography advice
28
resolution is good (14MP)
lack of manual focus
no manual exposure
external flash not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
28
has manual focus
can't use external flash
low megapixels (10MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus 7040 Street photography highlights
Ricoh CX5 Street photography highlights
57
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
61
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (205 grams)
no moving screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus 7040 Sports photography highlights
Ricoh CX5 Sports photography highlights
39
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14MP)
features tracking focus
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
25
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
low frames per second (5.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus 7040 Travel photography details
Ricoh CX5 Travel photography details
65
resolution is good (14MP)
has built in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
no Timelapse function
display is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
66
lighter than competition (205 grams)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
great reach (300mm)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus 7040 Landscape photography details
Ricoh CX5 Landscape photography details
42
relatively wide (28mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14MP)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
no manual exposure
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
no Timelapse function
45
has manual focus
reasonably wide (28mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
low megapixels (10MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 7040 as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh CX5 as a Vlogging camera
29
relatively wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
display is not selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
no microphone port
30
reasonably wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (205g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of mic support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus 7040 vs Ricoh CX5 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus 7040 and Ricoh CX5
 Olympus Stylus 7040Ricoh CX5
General Information
Make Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus Stylus 7040 Ricoh CX5
Also called as mju 7040 -
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2010-01-07 2011-07-19
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic III Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Maximum resolution 4288 x 3216 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 64 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-196mm (7.0x) 28-300mm (10.7x)
Maximal aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/3.5-5.6
Macro focusing range 2cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.9 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 secs 8 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 1.0 frames/s 5.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 5.70 m 4.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 144 gr (0.32 lbs) 205 gr (0.45 lbs)
Dimensions 95 x 56 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID - DB-100
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 seconds) Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SC/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Launch pricing $299 $399