Clicky

Olympus 7040 vs Ricoh WG-4

Portability
95
Imaging
37
Features
31
Overall
34
Olympus Stylus 7040 front
 
Ricoh WG-4 front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
44
Overall
41

Olympus 7040 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs

Olympus 7040
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 144g - 95 x 56 x 26mm
  • Released January 2010
  • Additionally referred to as mju 7040
Ricoh WG-4
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
  • Released February 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus 7040 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview

Below is a comprehensive comparison of the Olympus 7040 and Ricoh WG-4, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the 7040 (14MP) and the WG-4 (16MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras have the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The 7040 was released 5 years earlier than the WG-4 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the 7040 matches up versus the WG-4 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus 7040 over the Ricoh WG-4

 7040 WG-4 

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Olympus 7040

 WG-4 7040 
ReleasedFebruary 2014January 2010More recent by 49 months
Manually focus Very precise focusing
Screen resolution460k230kSharper screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Olympus 7040 and Ricoh WG-4

 7040 WG-4 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen measurements
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch screen Neither offers Touch screen

Olympus 7040 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison

If you are planning to lug around your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus 7040 offers physical measurements of 95mm x 56mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 144 grams (0.32 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 has sizing of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus 7040 and Ricoh WG-4 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at the time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the 7040 versus the WG-4.

Olympus 7040 vs Ricoh WG-4 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 7040 and WG-4 is 95 and 90 respectively.

Olympus 7040 vs Ricoh WG-4 top view buttons comparison

Olympus 7040 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is hard to picture the difference between sensor measurements just by looking at technical specs. The visual below will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the 7040 and WG-4.

As you have seen, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Ricoh WG-4 to resolve greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older 7040 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Olympus 7040 vs Ricoh WG-4 sensor size comparison

Olympus 7040 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus 7040 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus 7040 Portrait photography highlights
Ricoh WG-4 Portrait photography highlights
28
MP count good (14MP)
lack of manual focus
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
41
you can focus manually
MP count good (16MP)
features face detection autofocus
manual mode not available
can't use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus 7040
Street photography with Ricoh WG-4
57
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
61
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
no articulating screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus 7040 Sports photography info
Ricoh WG-4 Sports photography info
39
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
comes with tracking focus
slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
45
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (16MP)
features tracking autofocus
environment sealing
very slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames/s)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
terrible battery (240 per charge)
no phase detect autofocus
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Travel Comparison

Olympus 7040 Travel photography details
Ricoh WG-4 Travel photography details
65
MP count good (14MP)
built-in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
72
environment sealing
MP count good (16MP)
has built in flash
fairly wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
terrible battery (240 shots)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus 7040 Landscape photography features
Ricoh WG-4 Landscape photography features
42
relatively wide (28mm)
nice screen size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (14MP)
lack of manual focus
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
lack of manual mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse mode
54
you can focus manually
fairly wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
good sized screen (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
environment sealing
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
manual mode not available
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
terrible battery (240 shots)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 7040 as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh WG-4 as a Vlogging camera
29
relatively wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have microphone support
36
fairly wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection autofocus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
doesn't have external mic support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus 7040 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus 7040 and Ricoh WG-4
 Olympus Stylus 7040Ricoh WG-4
General Information
Brand Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus Stylus 7040 Ricoh WG-4
Alternative name mju 7040 -
Category Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Released 2010-01-07 2014-02-05
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic III -
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4288 x 3216 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 6400
Minimum native ISO 64 125
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-196mm (7.0x) 25-100mm (4.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/2.0-4.9
Macro focus range 2cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.9 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 230 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display technology - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 seconds 4 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 1.0 frames/s 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 5.70 m 10.00 m (Auto ISO)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 144g (0.32 lbs) 230g (0.51 lbs)
Physical dimensions 95 x 56 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 240 photographs
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model - D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 seconds) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SC/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal
Card slots 1 1
Cost at launch $299 $330