Olympus 7040 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
95 Imaging
36 Features
31 Overall
34
90 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Olympus 7040 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 144g - 95 x 56 x 26mm
- Released January 2010
- Other Name is mju 7040
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched February 2014
- Replacement is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus 7040 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Olympus 7040 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the 7040 (14MP) and the WG-4 GPS (16MP) is relatively close and both cameras have the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe 7040 was manufactured 5 years before the WG-4 GPS and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a complete comparison, here is a short introduction of how the 7040 grades versus the WG-4 GPS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus 7040 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus 7040 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus 7040 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 7040 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| 7040 | WG-4 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Olympus 7040
| WG-4 GPS | 7040 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2014 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 49 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 7040 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| 7040 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither has Touch screen |
Olympus 7040 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera, you will want to consider its weight and size. The Olympus 7040 has outer measurements of 95mm x 56mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") and a weight of 144 grams (0.32 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has specifications of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
See the Olympus 7040 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use at that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the 7040 vs the WG-4 GPS.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the 7040 and WG-4 GPS is 95 and 90 respectively.
Olympus 7040 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to see the gap in sensor measurements simply by researching technical specs. The graphic below should provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the 7040 and WG-4 GPS.
As you can tell, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to result in more detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The older 7040 will be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus 7040 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus 7040 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 7040 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus Stylus 7040 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
| Otherwise known as | mju 7040 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2010-01-07 | 2014-02-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 2cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.70 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 144 gr (0.32 lbs) | 235 gr (0.52 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 56 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 pictures |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SC/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $299 | $210 |