Olympus 7040 vs Ricoh WG-50
95 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
Olympus 7040 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 144g - 95 x 56 x 26mm
- Released January 2010
- Alternate Name is mju 7040
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed May 2017
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus 7040 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Olympus 7040 and Ricoh WG-50, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the 7040 (14MP) and the WG-50 (16MP) is relatively similar and both cameras provide the same sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe 7040 was unveiled 8 years before the WG-50 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a detailed comparison, here is a short introduction of how the 7040 matches up vs the WG-50 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus 7040 vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus 7040 & Ricoh WG-50. The full galleries are provided at Olympus 7040 Gallery & Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 7040 over the Ricoh WG-50
| 7040 | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Olympus 7040
| WG-50 | 7040 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | May 2017 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 89 months |
| Manually focus |  | More exact focus |
Common features in the Olympus 7040 and Ricoh WG-50
| 7040 | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither has Touch screen |
Olympus 7040 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus 7040 has external measurements of 95mm x 56mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") along with a weight of 144 grams (0.32 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-50 has measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check out the Olympus 7040 and Ricoh WG-50 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the 7040 vs the WG-50.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the 7040 and WG-50 is 95 and 91 respectively.
Olympus 7040 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to see the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by going over specifications. The pic underneath might give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the 7040 and WG-50.
To sum up, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Ricoh WG-50 to offer you more detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged 7040 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus 7040 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus 7040 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 7040 | Ricoh WG-50 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus Stylus 7040 | Ricoh WG-50 |
| Also called as | mju 7040 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2010-01-07 | 2017-05-24 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 2cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per second | 8.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.70 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | On, off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 144 grams (0.32 lb) | 193 grams (0.43 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 56 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 shots |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SC/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $299 | $280 |
