Olympus 7040 vs Samsung HZ10W
95 Imaging
36 Features
31 Overall
34
90 Imaging
32 Features
27 Overall
30
Olympus 7040 vs Samsung HZ10W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 144g - 95 x 56 x 26mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Alternative Name is mju 7040
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Introduced May 2009
- Additionally referred to as WB500
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus 7040 vs Samsung HZ10W Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Olympus 7040 vs Samsung HZ10W, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Olympus and Samsung. There is a big difference among the sensor resolutions of the 7040 (14MP) and HZ10W (10MP) but they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe 7040 was launched 8 months after the HZ10W which means that they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the 7040 scores vs the HZ10W in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Olympus 7040 vs Samsung HZ10W Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus 7040 and Samsung HZ10W. The complete galleries are available at Olympus 7040 Gallery and Samsung HZ10W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 7040 over the Samsung HZ10W
| 7040 | HZ10W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2010 |  | May 2009 | More modern by 8 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ10W over the Olympus 7040
| HZ10W | 7040 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus 7040 and Samsung HZ10W
| 7040 | HZ10W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 7040 vs Samsung HZ10W Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera often, you have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 7040 comes with external dimensions of 95mm x 56mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") with a weight of 144 grams (0.32 lbs) and the Samsung HZ10W has dimensions of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") with a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus 7040 vs Samsung HZ10W in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the 7040 versus the HZ10W.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the 7040 and HZ10W is 95 and 90 respectively.
Olympus 7040 vs Samsung HZ10W Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizes purely by checking out a spec sheet. The pic here may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the 7040 and HZ10W.
As you can see, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You should expect the Olympus 7040 to produce greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more recent 7040 should have a benefit in sensor technology.
Olympus 7040 vs Samsung HZ10W Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus 7040 vs Samsung HZ10W Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 7040 | Samsung HZ10W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Stylus 7040 | Samsung HZ10W |
| Also Known as | mju 7040 | WB500 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2010-01-07 | 2009-05-14 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2432 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.3-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 2cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.70 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 144 grams (0.32 pounds) | 249 grams (0.55 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 56 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SC/SDHC, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $299 | $300 |