Olympus 7040 vs Samsung WB35F
95 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
![Olympus Stylus 7040 front Olympus Stylus 7040 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-Stylus-7040/Olympus-7040-front.jpg)
![Samsung WB35F front Samsung WB35F front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-WB35F/Samsung-WB35F-front.jpg)
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Olympus 7040 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 144g - 95 x 56 x 26mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Also referred to as mju 7040
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2014
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Olympus 7040 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus 7040 versus Samsung WB35F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the 7040 (14MP) and the WB35F (16MP) is pretty similar and both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
The 7040 was launched 5 years prior to the WB35F which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a thorough comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the 7040 matches up against the WB35F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Olympus 7040 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus 7040 & Samsung WB35F. The complete galleries are available at Olympus 7040 Gallery & Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 7040 over the Samsung WB35F
7040 | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Olympus 7040
WB35F | 7040 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2014 | ![]() | January 2010 | More modern by 48 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing |
Common features in the Olympus 7040 and Samsung WB35F
7040 | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 7040 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 7040 comes with outside dimensions of 95mm x 56mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") along with a weight of 144 grams (0.32 lbs) while the Samsung WB35F has dimensions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Compare the Olympus 7040 versus Samsung WB35F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the 7040 compared to the WB35F.
![Olympus 7040 vs Samsung WB35F size comparison Olympus 7040 vs Samsung WB35F size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-Stylus-7040-vs-Samsung-WB35F-size-comparison.jpg)
Using size and weight, the portability score of the 7040 and WB35F is 95 and 93 respectively.
![Olympus 7040 vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison Olympus 7040 vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-Stylus-7040-vs-Samsung-WB35F-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Olympus 7040 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to envision the difference between sensor sizes merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The picture underneath may give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the 7040 and WB35F.
As you can see, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Samsung WB35F to offer more detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more aged 7040 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
![Olympus 7040 vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison Olympus 7040 vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Olympus-Stylus-7040-vs-Samsung-WB35F-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Olympus 7040 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
![Olympus 7040 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus 7040 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-Stylus-7040-vs-Samsung-WB35F-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Olympus 7040 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
Olympus Stylus 7040 | Samsung WB35F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus Stylus 7040 | Samsung WB35F |
Other name | mju 7040 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2010-01-07 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Macro focus range | 2cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.70 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 144g (0.32 pounds) | 194g (0.43 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 56 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SC/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $299 | $130 |