Olympus 9000 vs Olympus SH-3
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus SH-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Released May 2009
- Alternative Name is mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Launched February 2016
- Previous Model is Olympus SH-2
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus SH-3 Overview
In this write-up, we will be evaluating the Olympus 9000 vs Olympus SH-3, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both produced by Olympus. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and SH-3 (16MP) but they possess the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe 9000 was introduced 7 years before the SH-3 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a complete comparison, below is a simple overview of how the 9000 matches up against the SH-3 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus SH-3 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus 9000 & Olympus Stylus SH-3. The whole galleries are available at Olympus 9000 Gallery & Olympus SH-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Olympus SH-3
9000 | SH-3 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Olympus 9000
SH-3 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2016 | May 2009 | Newer by 82 months | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Olympus SH-3
9000 | SH-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | No manual focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus SH-3 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 9000 comes with outside dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) whilst the Olympus SH-3 has dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus 9000 vs Olympus SH-3 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the 9000 and the SH-3.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the 9000 and SH-3 is 92 and 88 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus SH-3 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions only by reviewing specs. The picture underneath may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the 9000 and SH-3.
All in all, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Olympus SH-3 to offer you extra detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged 9000 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus SH-3 Specifications
Olympus Stylus 9000 | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Olympus Stylus SH-3 |
Also referred to as | mju 9000 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2009-05-14 | 2016-02-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 50 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 11.5 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 225 gr (0.50 lbs) | 271 gr (0.60 lbs) |
Dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 380 pictures |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $300 | $579 |