Olympus 9000 vs Olympus Tough-3000
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched May 2009
- Alternate Name is mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 3000
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus 9000 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Olympus 9000 vs Olympus Tough-3000, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof and they are both designed by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the 9000 (12MP) and the Tough-3000 (12MP) is pretty well matched and they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe 9000 was manufactured 7 months earlier than the Tough-3000 which means that they are both of a similar age. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the 9000 grades versus the Tough-3000 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus 9000 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus 9000 & Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus 9000 Gallery & Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Olympus Tough-3000
| 9000 | Tough-3000 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Olympus 9000
| Tough-3000 | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2010 |  | May 2009 | More recent by 7 months |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Olympus Tough-3000
| 9000 | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equivalent screen measurements |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus 9000 provides outside measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Olympus Tough-3000 has measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check the Olympus 9000 vs Olympus Tough-3000 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the 9000 against the Tough-3000.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 9000 and Tough-3000 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to envision the difference between sensor measurements purely by checking specifications. The visual underneath will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the 9000 and Tough-3000.
Plainly, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the identical megapixels therefore you can expect similar quality of images however you will want to consider the age of the products into consideration. The older 9000 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 9000 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
| Also called as | mju 9000 | mju Tough 3000 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2009-05-14 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 50 | 64 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 2cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.00 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 225g (0.50 pounds) | 159g (0.35 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $300 | $0 |
