Olympus 9000 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced May 2009
- Also referred to as mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Launched May 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus 9000 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the Olympus 9000 versus Olympus TG-1 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof and they are both offered by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the 9000 (12MP) and the TG-1 iHS (12MP) is pretty similar and they use the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe 9000 was launched 4 years before the TG-1 iHS which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the 9000 scores against the TG-1 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus 9000 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus 9000 & Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS. The complete galleries are available at Olympus 9000 Gallery & Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| 9000 | TG-1 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Olympus 9000
| TG-1 iHS | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2012 |  | May 2009 | Newer by 36 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+380k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Olympus TG-1 iHS
| 9000 | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus 9000 features outside measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-1 iHS has specifications of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
See the Olympus 9000 versus Olympus TG-1 iHS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at the time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the 9000 vs the TG-1 iHS.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the 9000 and TG-1 iHS is 92 and 91 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reading technical specs. The pic below will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the 9000 and TG-1 iHS.
As you can tell, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact megapixels so you can expect similar quality of images though you really should take the age of the products into consideration. The more aged 9000 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 9000 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS |
| Also Known as | mju 9000 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2009-05-14 | 2012-05-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 50 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 610k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 225 grams (0.50 pounds) | 230 grams (0.51 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 pictures |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | LI90B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 and 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | - |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $300 | $399 |
