Olympus 9000 vs Olympus TG-4
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced May 2009
- Alternate Name is mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Revealed April 2015
- Earlier Model is Olympus TG-3
- Later Model is Olympus TG-5
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus 9000 vs Olympus TG-4 Overview
Below is a extended assessment of the Olympus 9000 and Olympus TG-4, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof and both are sold by Olympus. There is a huge difference between the sensor resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and TG-4 (16MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe 9000 was launched 6 years prior to the TG-4 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a thorough comparison, here is a concise overview of how the 9000 grades vs the TG-4 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus 9000 vs Olympus TG-4 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus 9000 and Olympus Tough TG-4. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus 9000 Gallery and Olympus TG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Olympus TG-4
| 9000 | TG-4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Olympus 9000
| TG-4 | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | April 2015 |  | May 2009 | More recent by 72 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Olympus TG-4
| 9000 | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera, you should think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus 9000 has got physical dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Olympus TG-4 has proportions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Examine the Olympus 9000 and Olympus TG-4 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the 9000 and the TG-4.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the 9000 and TG-4 is 92 and 90 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to envision the gap between sensor measurements simply by looking at technical specs. The visual below should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the 9000 and TG-4.
As you can tell, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Olympus TG-4 to resolve greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The older 9000 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 9000 | Olympus Tough TG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Olympus Tough TG-4 |
| Also Known as | mju 9000 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2009-05-14 | 2015-04-13 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 50 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 225g (0.50 lb) | 247g (0.54 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 380 pictures |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $300 | $379 |