Olympus 9000 vs Olympus TG-5
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
90 Imaging
38 Features
51 Overall
43
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus TG-5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched May 2009
- Alternate Name is mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Push to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 250g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Announced May 2017
- Superseded the Olympus TG-4
- Refreshed by Olympus TG-6
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus TG-5 Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Olympus 9000 and Olympus TG-5, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof and both are manufactured by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the 9000 (12MP) and the TG-5 (12MP) is very well matched and they possess the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe 9000 was revealed 9 years before the TG-5 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the 9000 matches up against the TG-5 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus TG-5 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus 9000 & Olympus Tough TG-5. The full galleries are provided at Olympus 9000 Gallery & Olympus TG-5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Olympus TG-5
9000 | TG-5 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-5 over the Olympus 9000
TG-5 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | May 2017 | May 2009 | Newer by 97 months | |
Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Olympus TG-5
9000 | TG-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus TG-5 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus 9000 has got physical dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Olympus TG-5 has proportions of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
See the Olympus 9000 and Olympus TG-5 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the 9000 against the TG-5.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 9000 and TG-5 is 92 and 90 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus TG-5 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to see the contrast between sensor dimensions just by reading through specs. The image underneath will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the 9000 and TG-5.
All in all, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same resolution so you can expect similar quality of pictures although you might want to factor the launch date of the products into consideration. The more aged 9000 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus TG-5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus TG-5 Specifications
Olympus Stylus 9000 | Olympus Tough TG-5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Olympus Tough TG-5 |
Also called as | mju 9000 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Launched | 2009-05-14 | 2017-05-17 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 50 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 20.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill, manual, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 225g (0.50 pounds) | 250g (0.55 pounds) |
Dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 340 images |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $300 | $449 |