Olympus 9000 vs Olympus VG-145
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus VG-145 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced May 2009
- Also referred to as mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Announced July 2011
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus VG-145 Overview
In this article, we will be analyzing the Olympus 9000 vs Olympus VG-145, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact and both are created by Olympus. The image resolution of the 9000 (12MP) and the VG-145 (14MP) is pretty comparable and they feature the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe 9000 was announced 3 years before the VG-145 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera and the Olympus VG-145 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going in to a more detailed comparison, below is a brief summation of how the 9000 scores against the VG-145 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus VG-145 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus 9000 & Olympus VG-145. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus 9000 Gallery & Olympus VG-145 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Olympus VG-145
9000 | VG-145 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-145 over the Olympus 9000
VG-145 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2011 | May 2009 | More modern by 26 months | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Olympus VG-145
9000 | VG-145 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Lack of manual focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus VG-145 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus 9000 offers physical measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Olympus VG-145 has specifications of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs).
Compare the Olympus 9000 vs Olympus VG-145 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the 9000 against the VG-145.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 9000 and VG-145 is 92 and 96 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus VG-145 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizes only by going through specs. The pic below will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the 9000 and VG-145.
All in all, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Olympus VG-145 to provide extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more aged 9000 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus VG-145 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus VG-145 Specifications
Olympus Stylus 9000 | Olympus VG-145 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Olympus VG-145 |
Other name | mju 9000 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2009-05-14 | 2011-07-27 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 50 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m | 4.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 225g (0.50 lbs) | 120g (0.26 lbs) |
Dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 160 shots |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $300 | $0 |