Olympus 9000 vs Olympus XZ-1
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced May 2009
- Additionally referred to as mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Launched January 2011
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Olympus 9000 versus Olympus XZ-1, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras and both are offered by Olympus. The image resolution of the 9000 (12MP) and the XZ-1 (10MP) is very well matched but the 9000 (1/2.3") and XZ-1 (1/1.63") feature totally different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe 9000 was unveiled 20 months earlier than the XZ-1 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a concise summation of how the 9000 matches up vs the XZ-1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus 9000 and Olympus XZ-1. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus 9000 Gallery and Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Olympus XZ-1
9000 | XZ-1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Olympus 9000
XZ-1 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2011 | May 2009 | More modern by 20 months | |
Manually focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 614k | 230k | Sharper display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Olympus XZ-1
9000 | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither has Touch display |
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 9000 has outside dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-1 has dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Examine the Olympus 9000 versus Olympus XZ-1 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the 9000 versus the XZ-1.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the 9000 and XZ-1 is 92 and 88 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to see the contrast between sensor sizes just by reading through technical specs. The pic below will offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the 9000 and XZ-1.
As you can tell, each of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The 9000 using its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field harder and the Olympus 9000 will give greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged 9000 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
Olympus Stylus 9000 | Olympus XZ-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Olympus XZ-1 |
Also called | mju 9000 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2009-05-14 | 2011-01-26 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic V |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.63" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 44.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3664 x 2752 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 50 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 4.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 614k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | OLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 225 gr (0.50 lbs) | 275 gr (0.61 lbs) |
Dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 34 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 18.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 117 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 shots |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $300 | $567 |