Olympus 9000 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced May 2009
- Also referred to as mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Below is a thorough review of the Olympus 9000 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras and both of them are created by Olympus. The resolution of the 9000 (12MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is relatively similar but the 9000 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") have totally different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe 9000 was unveiled 4 years before the XZ-2 iHS and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a in depth comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the 9000 matches up vs the XZ-2 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus 9000 & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The full galleries are available at Olympus 9000 Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
9000 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus 9000
XZ-2 iHS | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | December 2012 | May 2009 | More recent by 43 months | |
Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
9000 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 9000 comes with outside measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Check the Olympus 9000 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at the time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the 9000 versus the XZ-2 iHS.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the 9000 and XZ-2 iHS is 92 and 85 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to visualise the gap between sensor measurements purely by reviewing specifications. The visual here will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the 9000 and XZ-2 iHS.
To sum up, the 2 cameras come with the identical MP albeit not the same sensor measurements. The 9000 has the tinier sensor which will make getting bokeh harder. The older 9000 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus Stylus 9000 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Otherwise known as | mju 9000 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2009-05-14 | 2012-12-18 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 50 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 225 gr (0.50 lbs) | 346 gr (0.76 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 340 images |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $300 | $450 |