Clicky

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic S1

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29
Olympus Stylus 9000 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DC-S1 front
Portability
54
Imaging
75
Features
84
Overall
78

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic S1 Key Specs

Olympus 9000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 50 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
  • Introduced May 2009
  • Alternate Name is mju 9000
Panasonic S1
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3.2" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 51200 (Bump to 204800)
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Leica L Mount
  • 1021g - 149 x 110 x 97mm
  • Announced February 2019
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic S1 Overview

Lets take a closer look at the Olympus 9000 versus Panasonic S1, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and S1 (24MP) and the 9000 (1/2.3") and S1 (Full frame) have totally different sensor dimensions.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The 9000 was launched 10 years before the S1 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic S1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.

Before we go straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short introduction of how the 9000 scores versus the S1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Panasonic S1

 9000 S1 

Reasons to pick Panasonic S1 over the Olympus 9000

 S1 9000 
AnnouncedFebruary 2019May 2009More modern by 118 months
Manually focus Very precise focusing
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen dimensions3.2"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution2100k230kSharper screen (+1870k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Panasonic S1

 9000 S1 
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic S1 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera, you will have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus 9000 offers external measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) whilst the Panasonic S1 has measurements of 149mm x 110mm x 97mm (5.9" x 4.3" x 3.8") along with a weight of 1021 grams (2.25 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus 9000 versus Panasonic S1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have during that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the 9000 compared to the S1.

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic S1 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the 9000 and S1 is 92 and 54 respectively.

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic S1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic S1 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it's tough to visualise the difference between sensor sizes simply by reading through a spec sheet. The image here will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the 9000 and S1.

As you can see, each of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The 9000 due to its tinier sensor will make shooting bokeh more challenging and the Panasonic S1 will resolve more detail utilizing its extra 12MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more aged 9000 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic S1 sensor size comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic S1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic S1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus 9000 as a Portrait photography camera
Panasonic S1 as a Portrait photography camera
21
lack of manual focus
lack of manual mode
cannot use external flash
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
85
focusing manually
flash sync is higher than normal (1/320 seconds)
megapixel count decent (24 megapixels)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
has face detect autofocus
exports RAW formats
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Olympus 9000 as a Street photography camera
Panasonic S1 as a Street photography camera
53
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
more heavy than competitors (225 grams)
70
screen tilts up and down
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
exports RAW formats
boasts touch to focus
weather sealing
above average ISO range (51,200)
heavier than competitors in class (1,021g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus 9000 Sports photography details
Panasonic S1 Sports photography details
27
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority mode
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
76
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000s)
silent shooting (1/8,000s)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count decent (24MP)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
has tracking focus
weather sealing
terrible battery power (380 CIPA)
lack of phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus 9000 as a Travel photography camera
Panasonic S1 as a Travel photography camera
58
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
great reach (280mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
more heavy than competitors (225g)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
59
weather sealing
connects via bluetooth
boasts touch to focus
megapixel count decent (24MP)
terrible battery power (380 shots)
heavier than competitors in class (1,021 grams)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus 9000 as a Landscape photography camera
Panasonic S1 as a Landscape photography camera
32
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
small screen (2.7")
lack of manual mode
low resolution sensor (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
lack of Timelapse recording
81
focusing manually
swap lenses (Leica L mount)
screen size is decent (3.2 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count decent (24MP)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
no anti-alias filter
above average ISO range (51,200)
exports RAW formats
weather sealing
two card slots
terrible battery power (380 per charge)
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 9000 as a Vlogging camera
Panasonic S1 as a Vlogging camera
27
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
screen is not selfie friendly
video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of external microphone jack
more heavy than competitors (225g)
32
built-in touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
has face detect autofocus
high quality video (3840 x 2160 pxls)
includes mic socket
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
heavier than competitors in class (1,021 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic S1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus 9000 and Panasonic S1
 Olympus Stylus 9000Panasonic Lumix DC-S1
General Information
Brand Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus Stylus 9000 Panasonic Lumix DC-S1
Otherwise known as mju 9000 -
Type Small Sensor Compact Pro Mirrorless
Introduced 2009-05-14 2019-02-01
Physical type Compact SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor - Venus Engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" Full frame
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 35.6 x 23.8mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 847.3mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 24 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3968 x 2976 6000 x 4000
Max native ISO 1600 51200
Max boosted ISO - 204800
Min native ISO 50 100
RAW files
Min boosted ISO - 50
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points - 225
Lens
Lens support fixed lens Leica L
Lens zoom range 28-280mm (10.0x) -
Highest aperture f/3.2-5.9 -
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Available lenses - 30
Crop factor 5.9 1
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen diagonal 2.7 inches 3.2 inches
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 2,100 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 5,760 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.78x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 60 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/8000 seconds
Highest silent shutter speed - 1/8000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate - 9.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 5.00 m no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync w/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize - 1/320 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 150 Mbps, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM
Max video resolution 640x480 3840x2160
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264, H.265
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) Yes (can be charged with high-power laptop/tablet chargers or portable power banks)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 225 grams (0.50 pounds) 1021 grams (2.25 pounds)
Physical dimensions 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") 149 x 110 x 97mm (5.9" x 4.3" x 3.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 95
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 25.2
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 14.5
DXO Low light rating not tested 3333
Other
Battery life - 380 photographs
Battery type - Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (12 seconds) Yes
Time lapse recording
Storage type xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal -
Card slots Single Two
Pricing at launch $300 $2,498