Clicky

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS200

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29
Olympus Stylus 9000 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 front
Portability
86
Imaging
53
Features
66
Overall
58

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs

Olympus 9000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 50 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
  • Launched May 2009
  • Other Name is mju 9000
Panasonic ZS200
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
  • 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
  • Revealed February 2018
  • Alternative Name is Lumix DC-TZ200
  • Replaced the Panasonic ZS100
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview

Let's take a deeper look at the Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS200, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and ZS200 (20MP) and the 9000 (1/2.3") and ZS200 (1") have different sensor dimensions.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The 9000 was released 9 years before the ZS200 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before getting right into a complete comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the 9000 matches up versus the ZS200 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Panasonic ZS200

 9000 ZS200 

Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus 9000

 ZS200 9000 
RevealedFebruary 2018May 2009Newer by 106 months
Manually focus Dial accurate focusing
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1240k230kCrisper screen (+1010k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Panasonic ZS200

 9000 ZS200 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus 9000 has outer measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS200 has specifications of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") and a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).

Compare the Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS200 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose at that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the 9000 versus the ZS200.

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS200 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 9000 and ZS200 is 92 and 86 respectively.

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS200 top view buttons comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, its hard to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by looking at technical specs. The picture underneath should provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the 9000 and ZS200.

As you have seen, both of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The 9000 due to its tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh tougher and the Panasonic ZS200 will resolve extra detail as a result of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged 9000 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS200 sensor size comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus 9000 Portrait photography highlights
Panasonic ZS200 Portrait photography highlights
21
manual focus not available
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
65
manual focus
resolution is good (20MP)
sensor size is nice (1")
has face detection autofocus
supports RAW formats
can't use external flash
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus 9000 Street photography information
Panasonic ZS200 Street photography information
53
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
more heavy than competitors in class (225 grams)
77
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor size is nice (1")
supports RAW formats
supports focus by touch
fixed screen
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus 9000 Sports photography factors
Panasonic ZS200 Sports photography factors
27
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority mode
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
70
amazing zoom range (24-360mm 15.0 x zoom)
quiet mode (1/16,000 seconds)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (1")
has tracking autofocus
great battery pack (370 CIPA)
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus 9000 Travel photography factors
Panasonic ZS200 Travel photography factors
58
flash built-in
rather wide (28mm)
great zoom (280mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
more heavy than competitors in class (225g)
megapixel count low (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
76
great battery pack (370 CIPA)
has bluetooth
supports focus by touch
resolution is good (20MP)
built-in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
very long reach (360mm)
does not feature selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f3.3)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus 9000 Landscape photography features
Panasonic ZS200 Landscape photography features
32
rather wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
small screen (2.7")
lack of manual exposure
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse function
69
manual focus
fairly wide (24mm)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (1")
supports RAW formats
great battery pack (370 CIPA)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 9000 Vlogging advice
Panasonic ZS200 Vlogging advice
27
rather wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have external microphone support
more heavy than competitors in class (225g)
35
fairly wide (24mm)
touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection autofocus
high res video (3840 x 2160 pixels)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
does not feature selfie friendly display
no external microphone port
Photography Glossary

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus 9000 and Panasonic ZS200
 Olympus Stylus 9000Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200
General Information
Make Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus Stylus 9000 Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200
Also called mju 9000 Lumix DC-TZ200
Class Small Sensor Compact Large Sensor Compact
Launched 2009-05-14 2018-02-13
Body design Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - Venus Engine
Sensor type CCD MOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1"
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 13.2 x 8.8mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 116.2mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3968 x 2976 5472 x 3648
Maximum native ISO 1600 12800
Maximum enhanced ISO - 25600
Lowest native ISO 50 125
RAW images
Lowest enhanced ISO - 80
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points - 49
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-280mm (10.0x) 24-360mm (15.0x)
Max aperture f/3.2-5.9 f/3.3-6.4
Macro focusing distance 1cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.9 2.7
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 230k dot 1,240k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,330k dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.53x
Features
Min shutter speed 4s 60s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Max quiet shutter speed - 1/16000s
Continuous shutter speed - 10.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 5.00 m 6.80 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash settings Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) -
Maximum video resolution 640x480 3840x2160
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) Yes
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 225g (0.50 lb) 340g (0.75 lb)
Physical dimensions 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 370 photographs
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (12 seconds) Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible)
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at release $300 $800