Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS200
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
86 Imaging
53 Features
66 Overall
58
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched May 2009
- Other Name is mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Revealed February 2018
- Alternative Name is Lumix DC-TZ200
- Replaced the Panasonic ZS100
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS200, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and ZS200 (20MP) and the 9000 (1/2.3") and ZS200 (1") have different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe 9000 was released 9 years before the ZS200 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting right into a complete comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the 9000 matches up versus the ZS200 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS200 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus 9000 & Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200. The complete galleries are available at Olympus 9000 Gallery & Panasonic ZS200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Panasonic ZS200
9000 | ZS200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus 9000
ZS200 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2018 | May 2009 | Newer by 106 months | |
Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1240k | 230k | Crisper screen (+1010k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Panasonic ZS200
9000 | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus 9000 has outer measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS200 has specifications of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") and a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).
Compare the Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS200 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose at that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the 9000 versus the ZS200.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 9000 and ZS200 is 92 and 86 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by looking at technical specs. The picture underneath should provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the 9000 and ZS200.
As you have seen, both of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The 9000 due to its tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh tougher and the Panasonic ZS200 will resolve extra detail as a result of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged 9000 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications
Olympus Stylus 9000 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 |
Also called | mju 9000 | Lumix DC-TZ200 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2009-05-14 | 2018-02-13 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | MOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 50 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 1,240k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,330k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Max quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 225g (0.50 lb) | 340g (0.75 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 370 photographs |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $300 | $800 |