Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FH22
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
94 Imaging
37 Features
30 Overall
34
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FH22 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched May 2009
- Alternative Name is mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 170g - 100 x 57 x 27mm
- Announced January 2010
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-FS33
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FH22 Overview
Following is a in depth analysis of the Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FH22, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the 9000 (12MP) and the FH22 (14MP) is very close and they use the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe 9000 was launched 7 months prior to the FH22 which means that they are of a similar age. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a complete comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the 9000 matches up against the FH22 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FH22 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus 9000 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22. The complete galleries are available at Olympus 9000 Gallery & Panasonic FH22 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Panasonic FH22
| 9000 | FH22 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH22 over the Olympus 9000
| FH22 | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2010 |  | May 2009 | More modern by 7 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Panasonic FH22
| 9000 | FH22 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FH22 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus 9000 features outer measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Panasonic FH22 has proportions of 100mm x 57mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") and a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check the Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FH22 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at that time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the 9000 compared to the FH22.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the 9000 and FH22 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FH22 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to see the difference in sensor sizes only by looking through specs. The pic here will offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the 9000 and FH22.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Panasonic FH22 to render extra detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images a little more aggressively. The more aged 9000 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FH22 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FH22 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 9000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 |
| Otherwise known as | mju 9000 | Lumix DMC-FS33 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2009-05-14 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 50 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 28-224mm (8.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m | 5.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 225 grams (0.50 lb) | 170 grams (0.37 lb) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 100 x 57 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $300 | $200 |
