Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FH25
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
94 Imaging
39 Features
26 Overall
33
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FH25 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Released May 2009
- Alternative Name is mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 159g - 99 x 57 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2011
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-FS35
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FH25 Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the Olympus 9000 versus Panasonic FH25, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and FH25 (16MP) but they possess the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe 9000 was announced 20 months earlier than the FH25 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a simple overview of how the 9000 scores versus the FH25 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FH25 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus 9000 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus 9000 Gallery & Panasonic FH25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Panasonic FH25
9000 | FH25 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH25 over the Olympus 9000
FH25 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2011 | May 2009 | More recent by 20 months |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Panasonic FH25
9000 | FH25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Lack of manual focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 2.7" | 2.7" | Identical screen dimensions | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | The same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FH25 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 9000 features outer dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Panasonic FH25 has dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") and a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Look at the Olympus 9000 versus Panasonic FH25 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the 9000 vs the FH25.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the 9000 and FH25 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FH25 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to imagine the difference in sensor measurements merely by looking through technical specs. The photograph below should give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the 9000 and FH25.
As you have seen, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Panasonic FH25 to provide you with extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The older 9000 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FH25 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FH25 Specifications
Olympus Stylus 9000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 |
Otherwise known as | mju 9000 | Lumix DMC-FS35 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2009-05-14 | 2011-01-05 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Venus Engine VI |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 50 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 28-224mm (8.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Screen LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m | 5.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720p (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 225 gr (0.50 lb) | 159 gr (0.35 lb) |
Dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 99 x 57 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 250 photographs |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $300 | $180 |