Clicky

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS12

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29
Olympus Stylus 9000 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 front
Portability
95
Imaging
35
Features
14
Overall
26

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS12 Key Specs

Olympus 9000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 50 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
  • Introduced May 2009
  • Also referred to as mju 9000
Panasonic FS12
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600 (Increase to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 31-124mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 129g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
  • Launched April 2009
Photography Glossary

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS12 Overview

Below is a extensive review of the Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS12, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the 9000 (12MP) and the FS12 (12MP) is pretty well matched and they come with the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The 9000 was revealed very close to the FS12 so they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FS12 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before delving in to a detailed comparison, below is a concise summation of how the 9000 scores vs the FS12 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Panasonic FS12

 9000 FS12 

Reasons to pick Panasonic FS12 over the Olympus 9000

 FS12 9000 

Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Panasonic FS12

 9000 FS12 
LaunchedMay 2009April 2009Similar age
Manually focus Lack of manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing2.7"2.7"Equivalent screen sizing
Screen resolution230k230kIdentical screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch screen Missing Touch screen

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS12 Physical Comparison

When you are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus 9000 comes with external dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FS12 has sizing of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).

Examine the Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS12 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the 9000 and the FS12.

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS12 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 9000 and FS12 is 92 and 95 respectively.

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS12 top view buttons comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS12 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is very difficult to imagine the difference between sensor measurements only by looking at specifications. The photograph below will give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the 9000 and FS12.

To sum up, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the identical MP so you can expect similar quality of images although you will need to take the age of the products into consideration.

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS12 sensor size comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS12 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS12 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus 9000
Portrait photography with Panasonic FS12
21
lack of manual focus
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
low MP (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
21
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not available
can't use external flash
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus 9000 Street photography information
Panasonic FS12 Street photography information
53
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
more heavy than competitors (225g)
57
built in image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus 9000
Sports photography with Panasonic FS12
27
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority mode
low MP (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
25
built in image stabilization (Optical)
very slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus 9000 Travel photography details
Panasonic FS12 Travel photography details
58
flash built-in
really wide (28mm)
long reach (280mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
more heavy than competitors (225g)
low MP (12MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
51
has built in flash
doesn't have Timelapse recording
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (31mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus 9000
Landscape photography with Panasonic FS12
32
really wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
lack of manual exposure
low MP (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
lack of Timelapse recording
28
built in image stabilization (Optical)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (31mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
manual mode not available
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 9000 Vlogging details
Panasonic FS12 Vlogging details
27
really wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
screen is not selfie friendly
low quality video (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of microphone socket
more heavy than competitors (225g)
25
built in image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not good (31mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have microphone port
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS12 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus 9000 and Panasonic FS12
 Olympus Stylus 9000Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12
General Information
Make Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus Stylus 9000 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12
Also Known as mju 9000 -
Category Small Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Introduced 2009-05-14 2009-04-17
Body design Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3968 x 2976 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 1600 1600
Maximum boosted ISO - 6400
Minimum native ISO 50 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-280mm (10.0x) 31-124mm (4.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.2-5.9 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focus range 1cm 5cm
Crop factor 5.9 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7" 2.7"
Resolution of screen 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 seconds 60 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed - 2.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 5.00 m 6.30 m
Flash settings Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 225 grams (0.50 lb) 129 grams (0.28 lb)
Dimensions 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (12 seconds) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots One One
Launch price $300 $228