Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS12
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
95 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS12 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced May 2009
- Also referred to as mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-124mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 129g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Launched April 2009
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS12 Overview
Below is a extensive review of the Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS12, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the 9000 (12MP) and the FS12 (12MP) is pretty well matched and they come with the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe 9000 was revealed very close to the FS12 so they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FS12 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving in to a detailed comparison, below is a concise summation of how the 9000 scores vs the FS12 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS12 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus 9000 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus 9000 Gallery & Panasonic FS12 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Panasonic FS12
9000 | FS12 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS12 over the Olympus 9000
FS12 | 9000 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Panasonic FS12
9000 | FS12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2009 | April 2009 | Similar age | |
Manually focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" | Equivalent screen sizing | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS12 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus 9000 comes with external dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FS12 has sizing of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Examine the Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS12 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the 9000 and the FS12.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 9000 and FS12 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS12 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to imagine the difference between sensor measurements only by looking at specifications. The photograph below will give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the 9000 and FS12.
To sum up, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the identical MP so you can expect similar quality of images although you will need to take the age of the products into consideration.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS12 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS12 Specifications
Olympus Stylus 9000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 |
Also Known as | mju 9000 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2009-05-14 | 2009-04-17 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 50 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 31-124mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m | 6.30 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 225 grams (0.50 lb) | 129 grams (0.28 lb) |
Dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $300 | $228 |