Clicky

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS25

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29
Olympus Stylus 9000 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 front
Portability
95
Imaging
34
Features
24
Overall
30

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS25 Key Specs

Olympus 9000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 50 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
  • Introduced May 2009
  • Additionally Known as mju 9000
Panasonic FS25
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600 (Push to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 29-145mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
  • 148g - 97 x 58 x 22mm
  • Announced January 2009
Photography Glossary

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS25 Overview

Lets take a closer look at the Olympus 9000 and Panasonic FS25, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the 9000 (12MP) and the FS25 (12MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras posses the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The 9000 was revealed 4 months after the FS25 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before going into a full comparison, here is a quick summation of how the 9000 matches up vs the FS25 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Panasonic FS25

 9000 FS25 

Reasons to pick Panasonic FS25 over the Olympus 9000

 FS25 9000 
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")

Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Panasonic FS25

 9000 FS25 
AnnouncedMay 2009January 2009Same generation
Manual focus Lack of manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kIdentical display resolution
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch display Lack of Touch display

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS25 Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and size. The Olympus 9000 features outer measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FS25 has specifications of 97mm x 58mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 148 grams (0.33 lbs).

Compare the Olympus 9000 and Panasonic FS25 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the 9000 against the FS25.

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS25 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the 9000 and FS25 is 92 and 95 respectively.

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS25 top view buttons comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS25 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is very difficult to picture the contrast in sensor sizes purely by checking out specifications. The pic underneath will give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the 9000 and FS25.

To sum up, both the cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same exact megapixels therefore you should expect comparable quality of images although you have to consider the release date of the cameras into account.

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS25 sensor size comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS25 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS25 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus 9000 Portrait photography features
Panasonic FS25 Portrait photography features
21
no manual focus
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
26
provides face detection focus
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not available
cannot use external flash
low MP (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus 9000 as a Street photography camera
Panasonic FS25 as a Street photography camera
53
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
heavier than competitors (225 grams)
56
built in image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus 9000
Sports photography with Panasonic FS25
27
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority
low megapixels (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
25
built in image stabilization (Optical)
painfully slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
low MP (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus 9000 Travel photography highlights
Panasonic FS25 Travel photography highlights
58
flash built-in
quite wide (28mm)
very long zoom (280mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
heavier than competitors (225 grams)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
51
built-in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse function
low MP (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not fantastic (29mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus 9000 Landscape photography highlights
Panasonic FS25 Landscape photography highlights
32
quite wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
lack of manual exposure
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
32
good sized screen (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (29mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
manual exposure not available
low MP (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 9000 as a Vlogging camera
Panasonic FS25 as a Vlogging camera
27
quite wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
display isn't selfie friendly
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have mic support
heavier than competitors (225 grams)
28
built in image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection focus
wide angle not fantastic (29mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
display is not selfie friendly
low quality video (640 x 480 pxls)
doesn't have external mic socket
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS25 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus 9000 and Panasonic FS25
 Olympus Stylus 9000Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25
General Information
Company Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus Stylus 9000 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25
Also referred to as mju 9000 -
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2009-05-14 2009-01-27
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Full resolution 3968 x 2976 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 1600 1600
Max boosted ISO - 6400
Minimum native ISO 50 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points - 11
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-280mm (10.0x) 29-145mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.2-5.9 f/3.3-5.9
Macro focusing distance 1cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.9 5.9
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.7 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s 60s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate - 2.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 5.00 m 5.30 m
Flash settings Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 225 gr (0.50 pounds) 148 gr (0.33 pounds)
Physical dimensions 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") 97 x 58 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (12 seconds) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Retail pricing $300 $230