Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS42
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
95 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS42 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Additionally Known as mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000 (Bump to 6400)
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
- Revealed April 2009
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS42 Overview
The following is a in-depth analysis of the Olympus 9000 versus Panasonic FS42, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the 9000 (12MP) and the FS42 (10MP) is pretty close but the 9000 (1/2.3") and FS42 (1/2.5") posses totally different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe 9000 was revealed about the same time to the FS42 so they are of a similar age. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FS42 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight to a complete comparison, here is a short summation of how the 9000 matches up against the FS42 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS42 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus 9000 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42. The full galleries are available at Olympus 9000 Gallery & Panasonic FS42 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Panasonic FS42
9000 | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 2.7" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Olympus 9000
FS42 | 9000 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Panasonic FS42
9000 | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2009 | April 2009 | Same age | |
Manually focus | No manual focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS42 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus 9000 has got exterior dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Panasonic FS42 has specifications of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs).
Compare the Olympus 9000 versus Panasonic FS42 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Below is a front view scale comparison of the 9000 vs the FS42.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 9000 and FS42 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS42 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions simply by researching specs. The pic here may provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the 9000 and FS42.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The 9000 having a bigger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus 9000 will provide you with extra detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS42 Specifications
Olympus Stylus 9000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 |
Also called as | mju 9000 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2009-05-14 | 2009-04-17 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1000 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 50 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 2.5 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m | 6.30 m |
Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 225 grams (0.50 lbs) | 132 grams (0.29 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $300 | $580 |