Clicky

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS42

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29
Olympus Stylus 9000 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front
Portability
95
Imaging
33
Features
10
Overall
23

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS42 Key Specs

Olympus 9000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 50 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
  • Revealed May 2009
  • Additionally Known as mju 9000
Panasonic FS42
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1000 (Bump to 6400)
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
  • Revealed April 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS42 Overview

The following is a in-depth analysis of the Olympus 9000 versus Panasonic FS42, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the 9000 (12MP) and the FS42 (10MP) is pretty close but the 9000 (1/2.3") and FS42 (1/2.5") posses totally different sensor size.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The 9000 was revealed about the same time to the FS42 so they are of a similar age. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FS42 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before diving straight to a complete comparison, here is a short summation of how the 9000 matches up against the FS42 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Panasonic FS42

 9000 FS42 
Screen size2.7"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.2")

Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Olympus 9000

 FS42 9000 

Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Panasonic FS42

 9000 FS42 
RevealedMay 2009April 2009Same age
Manually focus No manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kIdentical screen resolution
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Missing Touch friendly screen

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS42 Physical Comparison

In case you're intending to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus 9000 has got exterior dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Panasonic FS42 has specifications of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs).

Compare the Olympus 9000 versus Panasonic FS42 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Below is a front view scale comparison of the 9000 vs the FS42.

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS42 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 9000 and FS42 is 92 and 95 respectively.

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS42 top view buttons comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS42 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is very hard to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions simply by researching specs. The pic here may provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the 9000 and FS42.

As you can plainly see, both of the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The 9000 having a bigger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus 9000 will provide you with extra detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively.

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS42 sensor size comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus 9000 as a Portrait photography camera
Panasonic FS42 as a Portrait photography camera
21
lack of manual focus
no manual control
external flash not possible
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
19
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
resolution not great (10MP)
very small sensor (1/2.5")
no RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus 9000
Street photography with Panasonic FS42
53
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
more heavy than others in class (225g)
47
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.5")
no RAW files
max ISO too low (1,000)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus 9000 Sports photography features
Panasonic FS42 Sports photography features
27
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority
megapixel count low (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
16
max frames per second low (2.0 fps)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (10MP)
very small sensor (1/2.5")
no phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus 9000 Travel photography factors
Panasonic FS42 Travel photography factors
58
built-in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
very long zoom (280mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
more heavy than others in class (225 grams)
megapixel count low (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
51
built-in flash
doesn't have Timelapse mode
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
wide angle not the best (33mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus 9000 Landscape photography advice
Panasonic FS42 Landscape photography advice
32
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
small screen (2.7")
no manual control
megapixel count low (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse recording
22
focusing manually not possible
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (33mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
small screen (2.5 inch)
lack of manual mode
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.5")
max ISO too low (1,000)
no RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 9000 Vlogging features
Panasonic FS42 Vlogging features
27
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have microphone jack
more heavy than others in class (225g)
22
wide angle not the best (33mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have external microphone support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS42 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus 9000 and Panasonic FS42
 Olympus Stylus 9000Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42
General Information
Make Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus Stylus 9000 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42
Also called as mju 9000 -
Category Small Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Revealed 2009-05-14 2009-04-17
Physical type Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.5"
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 5.744 x 4.308mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 24.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3968 x 2976 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 1600 1000
Highest boosted ISO - 6400
Lowest native ISO 50 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-280mm (10.0x) 33-132mm (4.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.2-5.9 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focusing range 1cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.9 6.3
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.7 inches 2.5 inches
Resolution of display 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4s 60s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate - 2.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 5.00 m 6.30 m
Flash options Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 225 grams (0.50 lbs) 132 grams (0.29 lbs)
Physical dimensions 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (12 seconds) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal SD/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Retail cost $300 $580