Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS7
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
95 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS7 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Released May 2009
- Alternative Name is mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 139g - 97 x 54 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS7 Overview
Here is a extended overview of the Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS7, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the 9000 (12MP) and the FS7 (10MP) is pretty similar but the 9000 (1/2.3") and FS7 (1/2.5") possess totally different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe 9000 was revealed 4 months later than the FS7 and they are both of a similar age. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FS7 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a short summation of how the 9000 grades versus the FS7 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS7 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus 9000 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS7. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus 9000 Gallery & Panasonic FS7 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Panasonic FS7
9000 | FS7 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS7 over the Olympus 9000
FS7 | 9000 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Panasonic FS7
9000 | FS7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2009 | January 2009 | Similar age | |
Manual focus | No manual focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 2.7" | 2.7" | Identical screen measurement | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS7 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus 9000 has got outer dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Panasonic FS7 has specifications of 97mm x 54mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.9") and a weight of 139 grams (0.31 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS7 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using during that time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the 9000 against the FS7.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the 9000 and FS7 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS7 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to envision the gap between sensor sizing just by reading a spec sheet. The visual here will give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the 9000 and FS7.
Clearly, each of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The 9000 having a bigger sensor will make achieving bokeh easier and the Olympus 9000 will offer greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS7 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FS7 Specifications
Olympus Stylus 9000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS7 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS7 |
Also called as | mju 9000 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Released | 2009-05-14 | 2009-01-16 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 50 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, Auto Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 225g (0.50 lb) | 139g (0.31 lb) |
Dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 97 x 54 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $300 | $160 |