Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FX75
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
94 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FX75 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Released May 2009
- Other Name is mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Introduced June 2010
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-FX70
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FX75 Overview
Below, we will be reviewing the Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FX75, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the 9000 (12MP) and the FX75 (14MP) is relatively close and they come with the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe 9000 was unveiled 12 months earlier than the FX75 and they are of a similar age. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the 9000 matches up against the FX75 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FX75 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus 9000 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75. The full galleries are available at Olympus 9000 Gallery & Panasonic FX75 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Panasonic FX75
| 9000 | FX75 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Olympus 9000
| FX75 | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2010 |  | May 2009 | More modern by 12 months |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Panasonic FX75
| 9000 | FX75 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Identical screen measurements |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FX75 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus 9000 comes with outside measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Panasonic FX75 has proportions of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
See the Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FX75 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the 9000 versus the FX75.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the 9000 and FX75 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FX75 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to picture the difference in sensor sizes simply by researching specs. The pic here might offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the 9000 and FX75.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You can count on the Panasonic FX75 to result in greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more aged 9000 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FX75 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 9000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 |
| Also called | mju 9000 | Lumix DMC-FX70 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2009-05-14 | 2010-06-01 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine HD II |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 50 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.2-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m | 7.40 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 225 grams (0.50 pounds) | 165 grams (0.36 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $300 | $139 |