Clicky

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ200

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29
Olympus Stylus 9000 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 front
Portability
65
Imaging
36
Features
64
Overall
47

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs

Olympus 9000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 50 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
  • Introduced May 2009
  • Alternate Name is mju 9000
Panasonic FZ200
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
  • 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
  • Released July 2012
  • Replaced the Panasonic FZ100
  • Later Model is Panasonic FZ300
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview

Lets look more in depth at the Olympus 9000 and Panasonic FZ200, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the 9000 (12MP) and the FZ200 (12MP) is very close and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The 9000 was brought out 4 years earlier than the FZ200 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before going into a complete comparison, here is a brief view of how the 9000 scores against the FZ200 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Panasonic FZ200

 9000 FZ200 

Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Olympus 9000

 FZ200 9000 
ReleasedJuly 2012May 2009Fresher by 38 months
Manually focus Dial accurate focusing
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kClearer display (+230k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Panasonic FZ200

 9000 FZ200 
Touch friendly display Neither offers Touch friendly display

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to carry your camera often, you need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus 9000 offers exterior measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ200 has specifications of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") and a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).

Check the Olympus 9000 and Panasonic FZ200 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with during that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the 9000 vs the FZ200.

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ200 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the 9000 and FZ200 is 92 and 65 respectively.

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ200 top view buttons comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is very tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizing only by researching specs. The photograph here might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the 9000 and FZ200.

All in all, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same exact MP and you should expect comparable quality of photographs however you may want to consider the release date of the cameras into account. The older 9000 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ200 sensor size comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus 9000 as a Portrait photography camera
Panasonic FZ200 as a Portrait photography camera
21
lack of manual focus
no manual control
can't use external flash
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
48
has manual focus
high flash sync speed (1/4,000s)
has face detection focus
exports RAW formats
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus 9000 as a Street photography camera
Panasonic FZ200 as a Street photography camera
53
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
more heavy than average in class (225 grams)
57
screen articulates fully
has image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW formats
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
heavier than average (588g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus 9000 Sports photography highlights
Panasonic FZ200 Sports photography highlights
27
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority
low megapixels (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
46
amazing zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
has tracking autofocus
great battery power (540 CIPA)
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus 9000 Travel photography highlights
Panasonic FZ200 Travel photography highlights
58
has built in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
great reach (280mm)
no Timelapse recording
more heavy than average in class (225g)
low megapixels (12MP)
does not contain selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
55
great battery power (540 CIPA)
flash built-in
selfie friendly screen
pretty wide (25mm)
great reach (600mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
heavier than average (588g)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus 9000 Landscape photography factors
Panasonic FZ200 Landscape photography factors
32
fairly wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
no manual control
low megapixels (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
no Timelapse recording
48
has manual focus
pretty wide (25mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW formats
great battery power (540 per charge)
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have Time Lapse mode
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus 9000
Vlogging with Panasonic FZ200
27
fairly wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
does not contain selfie friendly display
low quality video (640 x 480 pxls)
no microphone jack
more heavy than average in class (225 grams)
63
pretty wide (25mm)
selfie friendly screen
has image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
includes external mic socket
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
heavier than average (588 grams)
Photography Glossary

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus 9000 and Panasonic FZ200
 Olympus Stylus 9000Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus Stylus 9000 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200
Also referred to as mju 9000 -
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2009-05-14 2012-07-18
Physical type Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Powered by - Venus Engine VII FHD
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3968 x 2976 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Max boosted ISO - 6400
Lowest native ISO 50 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points - 23
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-280mm (10.0x) 25-600mm (24.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.2-5.9 f/2.8
Macro focusing range 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.9 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Screen diagonal 2.7 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen technology - Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 1,312k dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4s 60s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting rate - 12.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 5.00 m 13.50 m
Flash options Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize - 1/4000s
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 225 grams (0.50 lb) 588 grams (1.30 lb)
Physical dimensions 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 37
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 19.1
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 10.8
DXO Low light rating not tested 114
Other
Battery life - 540 photographs
Battery type - Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (12 seconds) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots One One
Pricing at launch $300 $499