Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ2500
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
53 Imaging
53 Features
81 Overall
64
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched May 2009
- Other Name is mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 4096 x 2160 video
- 24-480mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 915g - 138 x 102 x 135mm
- Launched September 2016
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FZ2000
- Earlier Model is Panasonic FZ1000
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Overview
Below is a in-depth review of the Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ2500, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a sizable gap among the resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and FZ2500 (20MP) and the 9000 (1/2.3") and FZ2500 (1") provide totally different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe 9000 was revealed 8 years prior to the FZ2500 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ2500 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a concise view of how the 9000 grades versus the FZ2500 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus 9000 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500. The full galleries are provided at Olympus 9000 Gallery & Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Panasonic FZ2500
9000 | FZ2500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ2500 over the Olympus 9000
FZ2500 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2016 | May 2009 | More recent by 89 months | |
Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 230k | Crisper screen (+810k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Panasonic FZ2500
9000 | FZ2500 |
---|
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus 9000 has got outer dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ2500 has measurements of 138mm x 102mm x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") along with a weight of 915 grams (2.02 lbs).
See the Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ2500 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose at the time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the 9000 versus the FZ2500.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 9000 and FZ2500 is 92 and 53 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to envision the difference in sensor measurements only by viewing technical specs. The visual underneath will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the 9000 and FZ2500.
As you have seen, both of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The 9000 with its smaller sensor will make shooting bokeh trickier and the Panasonic FZ2500 will result in greater detail because of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older 9000 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Specifications
Olympus Stylus 9000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 |
Otherwise known as | mju 9000 | Lumix DMC-FZ2000 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2009-05-14 | 2016-09-19 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 50 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 12.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m | 13.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 4096 x 2060 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 4096x2160 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 225g (0.50 lbs) | 915g (2.02 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 138 x 102 x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 538 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 photographs |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | DMW-BLC12 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $300 | $998 |