Clicky

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ2500

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29
Olympus Stylus 9000 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 front
Portability
53
Imaging
53
Features
81
Overall
64

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Key Specs

Olympus 9000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 50 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
  • Launched May 2009
  • Other Name is mju 9000
Panasonic FZ2500
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • 24-480mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
  • 915g - 138 x 102 x 135mm
  • Launched September 2016
  • Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FZ2000
  • Earlier Model is Panasonic FZ1000
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Overview

Below is a in-depth review of the Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ2500, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a sizable gap among the resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and FZ2500 (20MP) and the 9000 (1/2.3") and FZ2500 (1") provide totally different sensor sizing.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The 9000 was revealed 8 years prior to the FZ2500 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ2500 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a concise view of how the 9000 grades versus the FZ2500 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Panasonic FZ2500

 9000 FZ2500 

Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ2500 over the Olympus 9000

 FZ2500 9000 
LaunchedSeptember 2016May 2009More recent by 89 months
Focus manually More exact focus
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1040k230kCrisper screen (+810k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Panasonic FZ2500

 9000 FZ2500 

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Physical Comparison

If you're intending to lug around your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus 9000 has got outer dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ2500 has measurements of 138mm x 102mm x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") along with a weight of 915 grams (2.02 lbs).

See the Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ2500 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose at the time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the 9000 versus the FZ2500.

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ2500 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 9000 and FZ2500 is 92 and 53 respectively.

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ2500 top view buttons comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is very difficult to envision the difference in sensor measurements only by viewing technical specs. The visual underneath will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the 9000 and FZ2500.

As you have seen, both of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The 9000 with its smaller sensor will make shooting bokeh trickier and the Panasonic FZ2500 will result in greater detail because of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older 9000 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ2500 sensor size comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus 9000 Portrait photography factors
Panasonic FZ2500 Portrait photography factors
21
lack of manual focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
71
has manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
sensor size is good (1")
features face detect autofocus
saves RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus 9000 Street photography info
Panasonic FZ2500 Street photography info
53
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
heavier than competition in class (225g)
70
screen articulates fully
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor size is good (1")
saves RAW files
has touch to focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus 9000 Sports photography highlights
Panasonic FZ2500 Sports photography highlights
27
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of shutter priority mode
megapixel count low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
69
amazing zoom range (24-480mm 20.0 x zoom)
silent shooting (1/16,000s)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (1")
features tracking focus
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus 9000 as a Travel photography camera
Panasonic FZ2500 as a Travel photography camera
58
built-in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
great reach (280mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition in class (225g)
megapixel count low (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
66
has touch to focus
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
has built in flash
selfie friendly screen
really wide (24mm)
very long zoom (480mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus 9000 Landscape photography features
Panasonic FZ2500 Landscape photography features
32
relatively wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of manual focus
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
screen is small (2.7")
no manual control
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
65
has manual focus
really wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
sensor size is good (1")
saves RAW files
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 9000 as a Vlogging camera
Panasonic FZ2500 as a Vlogging camera
27
relatively wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
display is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have external mic port
heavier than competition in class (225 grams)
66
really wide (24mm)
selfie friendly screen
touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features face detect autofocus
high res video (4096 x 2160 pxls)
has mic port
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus 9000 and Panasonic FZ2500
 Olympus Stylus 9000Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500
General Information
Make Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus Stylus 9000 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500
Otherwise known as mju 9000 Lumix DMC-FZ2000
Type Small Sensor Compact Large Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2009-05-14 2016-09-19
Body design Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor - Venus Engine
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1"
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 13.2 x 8.8mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 116.2mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 20MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3968 x 2976 5472 x 3648
Highest native ISO 1600 12800
Highest boosted ISO - 25600
Lowest native ISO 50 125
RAW images
Lowest boosted ISO - 80
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points - 49
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-280mm (10.0x) 24-480mm (20.0x)
Max aperture f/3.2-5.9 f/2.8-4.5
Macro focus range 1cm 3cm
Focal length multiplier 5.9 2.7
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Screen sizing 2.7 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 1,040 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.74x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs 60 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Maximum silent shutter speed - 1/16000 secs
Continuous shooting speed - 12.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 5.00 m 13.20 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 4096 x 2060 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Highest video resolution 640x480 4096x2160
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 225g (0.50 lbs) 915g (2.02 lbs)
Physical dimensions 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") 138 x 102 x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 70
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.0
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.6
DXO Low light score not tested 538
Other
Battery life - 350 photographs
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model - DMW-BLC12
Self timer Yes (12 seconds) Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC card
Storage slots Single Single
Launch cost $300 $998