Clicky

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ300

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29
Olympus Stylus 9000 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 front
Portability
59
Imaging
37
Features
73
Overall
51

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ300 Key Specs

Olympus 9000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 50 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
  • Announced May 2009
  • Additionally Known as mju 9000
Panasonic FZ300
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1/16000s Maximum Shutter
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
  • 691g - 132 x 92 x 117mm
  • Launched July 2015
  • Older Model is Panasonic FZ200
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ300 Overview

Lets look a bit more in depth at the Olympus 9000 versus Panasonic FZ300, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the 9000 (12MP) and the FZ300 (12MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras boast the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The 9000 was revealed 7 years prior to the FZ300 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before getting into a complete comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the 9000 grades versus the FZ300 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Panasonic FZ300

 9000 FZ300 

Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ300 over the Olympus 9000

 FZ300 9000 
LaunchedJuly 2015May 2009Fresher by 75 months
Focus manually Very precise focus
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1040k230kSharper screen (+810k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Panasonic FZ300

 9000 FZ300 

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ300 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to carry your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus 9000 has got outside dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ300 has proportions of 132mm x 92mm x 117mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 4.6") and a weight of 691 grams (1.52 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus 9000 versus Panasonic FZ300 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the 9000 and the FZ300.

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ300 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the 9000 and FZ300 is 92 and 59 respectively.

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ300 top view buttons comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ300 Sensor Comparison

Often, it's hard to envision the difference in sensor sizing simply by seeing specifications. The photograph underneath will help give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the 9000 and FZ300.

Plainly, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same exact MP and you can expect comparable quality of files although you have to take the age of the cameras into account. The older 9000 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ300 sensor size comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ300 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus 9000 Portrait photography information
Panasonic FZ300 Portrait photography information
21
no manual focus
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
46
focusing manually
has face detection focusing
supports RAW formats
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus 9000 Street photography details
Panasonic FZ300 Street photography details
53
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
heavier than competition (225g)
59
screen can move to multiple angles
built in image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW formats
provides focus by touch
weather proof
very small sensor (1/2.3")
heavier than competitors (691g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus 9000
Sports photography with Panasonic FZ300
27
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
51
long zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
max shutter speed is good (1/16,000 seconds)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has tracking autofocus
weather proof
better than average battery pack (380 shots)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus 9000 as a Travel photography camera
Panasonic FZ300 as a Travel photography camera
58
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
very long reach (280mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
heavier than competition (225 grams)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
does not have selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
59
better than average battery pack (380 per charge)
weather proof
provides focus by touch
built-in flash
screen is selfie friendly
fairly wide (25mm)
very long reach (600mm)
heavier than competitors (691 grams)
megapixel count low (12MP)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus 9000 Landscape photography advice
Panasonic FZ300 Landscape photography advice
32
reasonably wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
tiny screen (2.7")
manual exposure not possible
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse function
52
focusing manually
fairly wide (25mm)
good sized screen (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW formats
weather proof
better than average battery pack (380 CIPA)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
megapixel count low (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 9000 Vlogging advice
Panasonic FZ300 Vlogging advice
27
reasonably wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
does not have selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have external mic jack
heavier than competition (225g)
62
fairly wide (25mm)
screen is selfie friendly
touch screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection focusing
great video quality (3840 x 2160 resolution)
does have external mic support
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
heavier than competitors (691 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus 9000 and Panasonic FZ300
 Olympus Stylus 9000Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus Stylus 9000 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300
Also referred to as mju 9000 -
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2009-05-14 2015-07-16
Physical type Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Powered by - Venus Engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3968 x 2976 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 1600 6400
Min native ISO 50 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points - 49
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-280mm (10.0x) 25-600mm (24.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.2-5.9 f/2.8
Macro focusing distance 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.9 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Display sizing 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 230k dots 1,040k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 1,440k dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Features
Min shutter speed 4 seconds 60 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/16000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate - 12.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 5.00 m 8.80 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, forced on, forced on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, forced off
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Highest video resolution 640x480 3840x2160
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 225 gr (0.50 lb) 691 gr (1.52 lb)
Physical dimensions 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") 132 x 92 x 117mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 4.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 380 images
Battery style - Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (12 seconds) Yes
Time lapse recording
Storage type xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC card
Card slots 1 1
Price at release $300 $598