Clicky

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ35

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29
Olympus Stylus 9000 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 front
Portability
72
Imaging
35
Features
37
Overall
35

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ35 Key Specs

Olympus 9000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 50 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
  • Introduced May 2009
  • Also referred to as mju 9000
Panasonic FZ35
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 27-486mm (F2.8-4.4) lens
  • 397g - 118 x 76 x 89mm
  • Introduced July 2010
  • Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-FZ38
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ35 Overview

Here is a complete overview of the Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ35, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the 9000 (12MP) and the FZ35 (12MP) is pretty well matched and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The 9000 was revealed 13 months earlier than the FZ35 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ35 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before diving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the 9000 scores against the FZ35 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Panasonic FZ35

 9000 FZ35 

Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ35 over the Olympus 9000

 FZ35 9000 
IntroducedJuly 2010May 2009Fresher by 13 months
Manually focus Very exact focus

Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Panasonic FZ35

 9000 FZ35 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension2.7"2.7"Identical screen dimensions
Screen resolution230k230kThe same screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch screen Neither offers Touch screen

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ35 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 9000 offers exterior measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ35 has dimensions of 118mm x 76mm x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") and a weight of 397 grams (0.88 lbs).

Compare the Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ35 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with at the time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the 9000 vs the FZ35.

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ35 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 9000 and FZ35 is 92 and 72 respectively.

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ35 top view buttons comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ35 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, its hard to imagine the gap between sensor sizing purely by reading through specifications. The visual underneath may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the 9000 and FZ35.

To sum up, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the identical megapixels therefore you should expect similar quality of files although you need to consider the release date of the products into consideration. The older 9000 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ35 sensor size comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ35 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus 9000 Portrait photography highlights
Panasonic FZ35 Portrait photography highlights
21
manual focus not available
no manual mode
can't use external flash
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
41
focusing manually
offers face detection focus
saves RAW files
can't use external flash
low MP (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus 9000
Street photography with Panasonic FZ35
53
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
more heavy than competitors (225 grams)
56
image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW files
fixed screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus 9000 Sports photography info
Panasonic FZ35 Sports photography info
27
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority mode
sensor resolution low (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
34
long zoom range (27-486mm 18.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
max frames per second very slow (2.0 frames/s)
low MP (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus 9000 Travel photography highlights
Panasonic FZ35 Travel photography highlights
58
has built in flash
really wide (28mm)
great reach (280mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
more heavy than competitors (225 grams)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
52
built-in flash
decently wide (27mm)
great zoom (486mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
low MP (12 megapixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Olympus 9000 as a Landscape photography camera
Panasonic FZ35 as a Landscape photography camera
32
really wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
manual focus not available
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
no manual mode
sensor resolution low (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse function
41
focusing manually
decently wide (27mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
low MP (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 9000 as a Vlogging camera
Panasonic FZ35 as a Vlogging camera
27
really wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
screen is not selfie friendly
low quality video (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have external microphone socket
more heavy than competitors (225 grams)
26
decently wide (27mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection focus
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external mic port
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ35 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus 9000 and Panasonic FZ35
 Olympus Stylus 9000Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35
General Information
Make Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus Stylus 9000 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35
Also referred to as mju 9000 Lumix DMC-FZ38
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2009-05-14 2010-07-06
Body design Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Chip - Venus Engine V
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3968 x 2976 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 1600 6400
Min native ISO 50 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-280mm (10.0x) 27-486mm (18.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.2-5.9 f/2.8-4.4
Macro focus distance 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.9 5.9
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.7 inch 2.7 inch
Display resolution 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs 60 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed - 2.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 5.00 m 8.50 m
Flash modes Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 225 grams (0.50 lbs) 397 grams (0.88 lbs)
Dimensions 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") 118 x 76 x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (12 seconds) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 pictures))
Time lapse recording
Type of storage xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots One One
Pricing at launch $300 $999