Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic G95
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
67 Imaging
62 Features
88 Overall
72
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic G95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Additionally Known as mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 20.3MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 536g - 130 x 94 x 77mm
- Introduced April 2019
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-G90
- Older Model is Panasonic G85
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic G95 Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic G95, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and G95 (20.3MP) and the 9000 (1/2.3") and G95 (Four Thirds) feature different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe 9000 was announced 11 years before the G95 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic G95 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the 9000 grades versus the G95 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic G95 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus 9000 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus 9000 Gallery and Panasonic G95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Panasonic G95
9000 | G95 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic G95 over the Olympus 9000
G95 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | April 2019 | May 2009 | Fresher by 120 months | |
Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1240k | 230k | Crisper display (+1010k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Panasonic G95
9000 | G95 |
---|
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic G95 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera, you have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus 9000 offers physical dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) whilst the Panasonic G95 has measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 77mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.0") and a weight of 536 grams (1.18 lbs).
Check the Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic G95 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the 9000 against the G95.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 9000 and G95 is 92 and 67 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic G95 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to picture the gap in sensor sizing just by researching technical specs. The photograph underneath will provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the 9000 and G95.
As you have seen, both of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The 9000 using its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Panasonic G95 will provide you with extra detail with its extra 8.3 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos much more aggressively. The older 9000 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic G95 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic G95 Specifications
Olympus Stylus 9000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95 |
Otherwise known as | mju 9000 | Lumix DMC-G90 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2009-05-14 | 2019-04-05 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20.3MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 50 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 107 |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1,240 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Highest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 9.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m | 6.40 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 225 gr (0.50 lbs) | 536 gr (1.18 lbs) |
Dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 130 x 94 x 77mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 290 images |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 10 secs x 3 shots) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported) |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $300 | $998 |