Clicky

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic GF1

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29
Olympus Stylus 9000 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 front
Portability
85
Imaging
47
Features
47
Overall
47

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic GF1 Key Specs

Olympus 9000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 50 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
  • Announced May 2009
  • Alternative Name is mju 9000
Panasonic GF1
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 385g - 119 x 71 x 36mm
  • Released October 2009
  • Updated by Panasonic GF2
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic GF1 Overview

In this article, we will be evaluating the Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic GF1, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the 9000 (12MP) and the GF1 (12MP) is relatively close but the 9000 (1/2.3") and GF1 (Four Thirds) enjoy totally different sensor sizing.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The 9000 was unveiled 5 months before the GF1 so they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic GF1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before getting straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the 9000 scores vs the GF1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Panasonic GF1

 9000 GF1 

Reasons to pick Panasonic GF1 over the Olympus 9000

 GF1 9000 
Focus manually Dial exact focus
Screen sizing3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kSharper screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Panasonic GF1

 9000 GF1 
ReleasedMay 2009October 2009Same generation
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch screen Absent Touch screen

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic GF1 Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to lug around your camera, you have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus 9000 features outside dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Panasonic GF1 has measurements of 119mm x 71mm x 36mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.4") along with a weight of 385 grams (0.85 lbs).

Check the Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic GF1 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the 9000 vs the GF1.

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic GF1 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the 9000 and GF1 is 92 and 85 respectively.

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic GF1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic GF1 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, its hard to envision the contrast in sensor measurements simply by researching technical specs. The graphic underneath will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the 9000 and GF1.

As you can tell, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact megapixel count albeit not the same sensor measurements. The 9000 contains the smaller sensor which should make getting shallower depth of field more difficult.

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic GF1 sensor size comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic GF1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic GF1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus 9000 Portrait photography advice
Panasonic GF1 Portrait photography advice
21
no manual focus
no manual control
no external flash support
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
60
you can focus manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides face detect focus
exports RAW files
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus 9000
Street photography with Panasonic GF1
53
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
heavier than competition (225g)
64
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus 9000 as a Sports photography camera
Panasonic GF1 as a Sports photography camera
27
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of shutter priority mode
MP count low (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
44
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides tracking focus
great battery power (380 per charge)
slow fps (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (12MP)
lack of phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus 9000
Travel photography with Panasonic GF1
58
flash built-in
rather wide (28mm)
great zoom (280mm)
missing Time Lapse function
heavier than competition (225 grams)
MP count low (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.2)
59
great battery power (380 CIPA)
has built in flash
doesn't have Timelapse recording
megapixel count low (12MP)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus 9000
Landscape photography with Panasonic GF1
32
rather wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no manual focus
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
no manual control
MP count low (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
missing Time Lapse function
60
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
great battery power (380 per charge)
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (12MP)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 9000 Vlogging advice
Panasonic GF1 Vlogging advice
27
rather wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (640 x 480 pixels)
missing external mic port
heavier than competition (225g)
25
provides face detect focus
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have microphone socket
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic GF1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus 9000 and Panasonic GF1
 Olympus Stylus 9000Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1
General Information
Brand Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus Stylus 9000 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1
Other name mju 9000 -
Type Small Sensor Compact Entry-Level Mirrorless
Announced 2009-05-14 2009-10-14
Physical type Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor - Venus Engine HD
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3968 x 2976 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 50 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points - 23
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Micro Four Thirds
Lens focal range 28-280mm (10.0x) -
Maximal aperture f/3.2-5.9 -
Macro focus distance 1cm -
Available lenses - 107
Focal length multiplier 5.9 2.1
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.7 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display tech - TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 secs 60 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting rate - 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 5.00 m 6.00 m
Flash modes Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize - 1/160 secs
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG AVCHD Lite
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 225 grams (0.50 lbs) 385 grams (0.85 lbs)
Dimensions 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") 119 x 71 x 36mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 54
DXO Color Depth score not tested 21.2
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 10.3
DXO Low light score not tested 513
Other
Battery life - 380 photos
Battery type - Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (12 seconds) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images))
Time lapse recording
Storage type xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal SD/SDHC/MMC
Card slots One One
Retail cost $300 $400