Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic GF2
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
88 Imaging
48 Features
50 Overall
48
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic GF2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced May 2009
- Additionally referred to as mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 310g - 113 x 68 x 33mm
- Released February 2011
- Old Model is Panasonic GF1
- Updated by Panasonic GF3
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic GF2 Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic GF2, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the 9000 (12MP) and the GF2 (12MP) is relatively close but the 9000 (1/2.3") and GF2 (Four Thirds) have different sensor measurements.
Photography GlossaryThe 9000 was manufactured 21 months before the GF2 which makes them a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic GF2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the 9000 grades versus the GF2 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic GF2 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus 9000 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2. The entire galleries are available at Olympus 9000 Gallery and Panasonic GF2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Panasonic GF2
9000 | GF2 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic GF2 over the Olympus 9000
GF2 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2011 | May 2009 | More modern by 21 months | |
Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Panasonic GF2
9000 | GF2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic GF2 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus 9000 comes with outer measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) whilst the Panasonic GF2 has sizing of 113mm x 68mm x 33mm (4.4" x 2.7" x 1.3") having a weight of 310 grams (0.68 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic GF2 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use at that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the 9000 and the GF2.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the 9000 and GF2 is 92 and 88 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic GF2 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizes purely by looking through technical specs. The image underneath might offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the 9000 and GF2.
As you can tell, both of the cameras have the same MP albeit different sensor sizes. The 9000 includes the smaller sensor which should make achieving bokeh more difficult. The more aged 9000 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic GF2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic GF2 Specifications
Olympus Stylus 9000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 |
Also Known as | mju 9000 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2009-05-14 | 2011-02-24 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 50 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 107 |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m | 6.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 225 grams (0.50 pounds) | 310 grams (0.68 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 113 x 68 x 33mm (4.4" x 2.7" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 54 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 21.2 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 506 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 photos |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $300 | $330 |