Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic GX85
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
83 Imaging
54 Features
76 Overall
62
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic GX85 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Released May 2009
- Also Known as mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 122 x 71 x 44mm
- Revealed April 2016
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-GX80 / Lumix DMC-GX7 Mark II
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic GX85 Overview
The following is a complete review of the Olympus 9000 versus Panasonic GX85, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and GX85 (16MP) and the 9000 (1/2.3") and GX85 (Four Thirds) boast different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe 9000 was brought out 7 years prior to the GX85 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic GX85 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple summation of how the 9000 matches up versus the GX85 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic GX85 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus 9000 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX85. The entire galleries are available at Olympus 9000 Gallery & Panasonic GX85 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Panasonic GX85
9000 | GX85 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic GX85 over the Olympus 9000
GX85 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | April 2016 | May 2009 | Newer by 83 months | |
Manually focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 230k | Clearer display (+810k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Panasonic GX85
9000 | GX85 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic GX85 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera regularly, you should consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 9000 offers external dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) whilst the Panasonic GX85 has dimensions of 122mm x 71mm x 44mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus 9000 versus Panasonic GX85 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the 9000 compared to the GX85.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the 9000 and GX85 is 92 and 83 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic GX85 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to picture the gap in sensor dimensions simply by researching specifications. The pic underneath will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the 9000 and GX85.
Plainly, each of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The 9000 because of its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Panasonic GX85 will provide you with greater detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop images way more aggressively. The more aged 9000 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic GX85 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic GX85 Specifications
Olympus Stylus 9000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX85 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX85 |
Also referred to as | mju 9000 | Lumix DMC-GX80 / Lumix DMC-GX7 Mark II |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2009-05-14 | 2016-04-05 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4592 x 3448 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 50 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 107 |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 1,040k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,764k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m | 6.00 m (at ISO 200) |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, forced on, forced on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, forced off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 225g (0.50 lb) | 426g (0.94 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 122 x 71 x 44mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 71 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.9 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 662 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 290 images |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $300 | $800 |