Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic SZ10
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
93 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic SZ10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Additionally referred to as mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 177g - 99 x 60 x 30mm
- Launched January 2015
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic SZ10 Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Olympus 9000 versus Panasonic SZ10, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and SZ10 (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe 9000 was released 6 years earlier than the SZ10 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise summation of how the 9000 scores vs the SZ10 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic SZ10 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus 9000 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ10. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus 9000 Gallery & Panasonic SZ10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Panasonic SZ10
| 9000 | SZ10 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic SZ10 over the Olympus 9000
| SZ10 | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2015 |  | May 2009 | Fresher by 68 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Panasonic SZ10
| 9000 | SZ10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic SZ10 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera often, you have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus 9000 has got external dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Panasonic SZ10 has measurements of 99mm x 60mm x 30mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 177 grams (0.39 lbs).
Check out the Olympus 9000 versus Panasonic SZ10 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose at that moment. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the 9000 vs the SZ10.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the 9000 and SZ10 is 92 and 93 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic SZ10 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to see the contrast in sensor sizing simply by going through a spec sheet. The photograph underneath may give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the 9000 and SZ10.
As you can see, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Panasonic SZ10 to provide more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots much more aggressively. The older 9000 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic SZ10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic SZ10 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 9000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ10 |
| Also called as | mju 9000 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-05-14 | 2015-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 50 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.4fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m | 5.20 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, on, slow sync w/redeye, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p), 320 x 240 (30p) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 225g (0.50 lb) | 177g (0.39 lb) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 99 x 60 x 30mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 200 pictures |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $300 | $200 |