Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic TS10
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
93 Imaging
36 Features
20 Overall
29
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic TS10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Released May 2009
- Other Name is mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 188g - 99 x 63 x 24mm
- Launched January 2010
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-FT10
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic TS10 Overview
In this write-up, we will be comparing the Olympus 9000 and Panasonic TS10, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the 9000 (12MP) and the TS10 (14MP) is pretty well matched and they feature the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe 9000 was released 8 months earlier than the TS10 so they are both of a similar age. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a in depth comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the 9000 scores versus the TS10 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic TS10 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus 9000 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS10. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus 9000 Gallery & Panasonic TS10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Panasonic TS10
| 9000 | TS10 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic TS10 over the Olympus 9000
| TS10 | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2010 |  | May 2009 | More recent by 8 months |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Panasonic TS10
| 9000 | TS10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic TS10 Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus 9000 comes with outer measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Panasonic TS10 has sizing of 99mm x 63mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus 9000 and Panasonic TS10 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the 9000 vs the TS10.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the 9000 and TS10 is 92 and 93 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic TS10 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to see the contrast between sensor measurements simply by looking at technical specs. The visual here will give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the 9000 and TS10.
As you have seen, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Panasonic TS10 to resolve more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots far more aggressively. The older 9000 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic TS10 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic TS10 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 9000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS10 |
| Also called | mju 9000 | Lumix DMC-FT10 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-05-14 | 2010-01-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 50 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m | 4.90 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 225g (0.50 lbs) | 188g (0.41 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 99 x 63 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $300 | $249 |