Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic TS20
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
95 Imaging
39 Features
28 Overall
34
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic TS20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Released May 2009
- Other Name is mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-100mm (F3.9-5.7) lens
- 142g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2012
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-FT20
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic TS20 Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus 9000 and Panasonic TS20, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and TS20 (16MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe 9000 was introduced 3 years prior to the TS20 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief overview of how the 9000 matches up against the TS20 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic TS20 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus 9000 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS20. The whole galleries are available at Olympus 9000 Gallery and Panasonic TS20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Panasonic TS20
9000 | TS20 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic TS20 over the Olympus 9000
TS20 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2012 | May 2009 | More recent by 33 months |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Panasonic TS20
9000 | TS20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | No manual focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 2.7" | 2.7" | Equal screen measurements | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | No Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic TS20 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus 9000 enjoys exterior measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Panasonic TS20 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
Examine the Olympus 9000 and Panasonic TS20 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have during that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the 9000 against the TS20.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the 9000 and TS20 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic TS20 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to picture the contrast in sensor measurements just by checking out specs. The visual below may give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the 9000 and TS20.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You should expect the Panasonic TS20 to show more detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots more aggressively. The older 9000 will be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic TS20 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic TS20 Specifications
Olympus Stylus 9000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS20 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS20 |
Also called | mju 9000 | Lumix DMC-FT20 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Released | 2009-05-14 | 2012-01-31 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 50 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.9-5.7 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1300 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m | 4.40 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 225 grams (0.50 lb) | 142 grams (0.31 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 250 photographs |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $300 | $179 |