Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic TS3
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
92 Imaging
35 Features
31 Overall
33
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic TS3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced May 2009
- Alternative Name is mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-128mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 197g - 103 x 64 x 27mm
- Introduced August 2011
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-FT3
- Earlier Model is Panasonic TS2
- Successor is Panasonic TS4
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic TS3 Overview
Below, we are looking at the Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic TS3, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the 9000 (12MP) and the TS3 (12MP) is very similar and they enjoy the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe 9000 was revealed 3 years earlier than the TS3 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the 9000 grades vs the TS3 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic TS3 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus 9000 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS3. The full galleries are available at Olympus 9000 Gallery & Panasonic TS3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Panasonic TS3
9000 | TS3 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic TS3 over the Olympus 9000
TS3 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2011 | May 2009 | More recent by 27 months |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Panasonic TS3
9000 | TS3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | No manual focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 2.7" | 2.7" | Identical display size | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither offers Touch display |
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic TS3 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you should think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 9000 offers outer dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Panasonic TS3 has dimensions of 103mm x 64mm x 27mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 197 grams (0.43 lbs).
Compare the Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic TS3 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the 9000 against the TS3.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the 9000 and TS3 is 92 and 92 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic TS3 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to imagine the difference between sensor measurements simply by reviewing specifications. The graphic below should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the 9000 and TS3.
Plainly, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact megapixels and you can expect similar quality of files although you would want to consider the launch date of the products into consideration. The older 9000 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic TS3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic TS3 Specifications
Olympus Stylus 9000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS3 |
Also Known as | mju 9000 | Lumix DMC-FT3 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2009-05-14 | 2011-08-16 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 50 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 28-128mm (4.6x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1300 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 4.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m | 5.60 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 225g (0.50 pounds) | 197g (0.43 pounds) |
Dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 103 x 64 x 27mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 310 pictures |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $300 | $380 |