Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS7
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
91 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS7 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced May 2009
- Alternative Name is mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-4.9) lens
- 218g - 103 x 60 x 33mm
- Released July 2011
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-TZ10
- New Model is Panasonic ZS8
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS7 Overview
In this article, we will be comparing the Olympus 9000 and Panasonic ZS7, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the 9000 (12MP) and the ZS7 (12MP) is pretty close and they enjoy the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe 9000 was manufactured 3 years prior to the ZS7 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a short summary of how the 9000 grades vs the ZS7 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS7 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus 9000 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7. The entire galleries are available at Olympus 9000 Gallery & Panasonic ZS7 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Panasonic ZS7
9000 | ZS7 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS7 over the Olympus 9000
ZS7 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2011 | May 2009 | Newer by 26 months | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Panasonic ZS7
9000 | ZS7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | No manual focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS7 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus 9000 features outer dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS7 has sizing of 103mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Check out the Olympus 9000 and Panasonic ZS7 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the 9000 and the ZS7.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the 9000 and ZS7 is 92 and 91 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS7 Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions just by researching a spec sheet. The pic below might provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the 9000 and ZS7.
Clearly, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same resolution and you can expect comparable quality of images however you really should consider the launch date of the cameras into account. The more aged 9000 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS7 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS7 Specifications
Olympus Stylus 9000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7 |
Also called | mju 9000 | Lumix DMC-TZ10 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2009-05-14 | 2011-07-19 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine HD II |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 50 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.3-4.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m | 5.30 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD Lite |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 225g (0.50 pounds) | 218g (0.48 pounds) |
Dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 103 x 60 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $300 | $350 |