Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS8
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
92 Imaging
37 Features
39 Overall
37
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS8 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Also referred to as mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-384mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 210g - 105 x 58 x 33mm
- Announced July 2011
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-TZ18
- Older Model is Panasonic ZS7
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS8 Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS8, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the 9000 (12MP) and the ZS8 (14MP) is very well matched and they feature the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe 9000 was revealed 3 years earlier than the ZS8 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a full comparison, below is a simple view of how the 9000 grades against the ZS8 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS8 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus 9000 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS8. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus 9000 Gallery & Panasonic ZS8 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Panasonic ZS8
| 9000 | ZS8 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS8 over the Olympus 9000
| ZS8 | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2011 |  | May 2009 | Fresher by 26 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Panasonic ZS8
| 9000 | ZS8 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | No Touch display |
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS8 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus 9000 has external dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS8 has specifications of 105mm x 58mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 210 grams (0.46 lbs).
Examine the Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS8 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the 9000 compared to the ZS8.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the 9000 and ZS8 is 92 and 92 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS8 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizing just by reading through technical specs. The visual below might offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the 9000 and ZS8.
As you have seen, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You can expect to see the Panasonic ZS8 to resolve more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images far more aggressively. The older 9000 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS8 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS8 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 9000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS8 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS8 |
| Also called | mju 9000 | Lumix DMC-TZ18 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-05-14 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Venus Engine FHD |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 50 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 24-384mm (16.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 225 grams (0.50 pounds) | 210 grams (0.46 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 105 x 58 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 images |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $300 | $275 |