Olympus 9000 vs Pentax K-500
92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6cd55/6cd55e755b246a73ebaa42d5216b8beb3a328143" alt="Olympus Stylus 9000 front Olympus Stylus 9000 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7664a/7664a04951cdb8a34b9dfe4c6285125ada24205c" alt="Pentax K-500 front Pentax K-500 front"
64 Imaging
58 Features
70 Overall
62
Olympus 9000 vs Pentax K-500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Also Known as mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 51600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 646g - 130 x 97 x 71mm
- Revealed November 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus 9000 vs Pentax K-500 Overview
Let's look a little more in depth at the Olympus 9000 versus Pentax K-500, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Olympus and Pentax. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and K-500 (16MP) and the 9000 (1/2.3") and K-500 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The 9000 was unveiled 5 years before the K-500 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera and the Pentax K-500 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the 9000 grades versus the K-500 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus 9000 vs Pentax K-500 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus 9000 and Pentax K-500. The full galleries are available at Olympus 9000 Gallery and Pentax K-500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Pentax K-500
9000 | K-500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax K-500 over the Olympus 9000
K-500 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | November 2013 | ![]() | May 2009 | Fresher by 55 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Pentax K-500
9000 | K-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Olympus 9000 vs Pentax K-500 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus 9000 has external measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) whilst the Pentax K-500 has proportions of 130mm x 97mm x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 646 grams (1.42 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus 9000 versus Pentax K-500 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the 9000 vs the K-500.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc62e/fc62e7c0f15fc7b67523fd06f25aa0e43ca5f12e" alt="Olympus 9000 vs Pentax K-500 size comparison Olympus 9000 vs Pentax K-500 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the 9000 and K-500 is 92 and 64 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd23a/dd23ac0e3cd5b09a0edb1c48b9b94afb8cc279eb" alt="Olympus 9000 vs Pentax K-500 top view buttons comparison Olympus 9000 vs Pentax K-500 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus 9000 vs Pentax K-500 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to see the difference in sensor sizing just by researching specs. The photograph below will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the 9000 and K-500.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The 9000 having a smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field more difficult and the Pentax K-500 will render more detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The older 9000 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45508/4550821c88c9ce698b8a0e467c02f539d0254853" alt="Olympus 9000 vs Pentax K-500 sensor size comparison Olympus 9000 vs Pentax K-500 sensor size comparison"
Olympus 9000 vs Pentax K-500 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52785/527856546055d39c4c4d758b8115efcdd0b62d5b" alt="Olympus 9000 vs Pentax K-500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus 9000 vs Pentax K-500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus 9000 vs Pentax K-500 Specifications
Olympus Stylus 9000 | Pentax K-500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Pentax K-500 |
Also referred to as | mju 9000 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Revealed | 2009-05-14 | 2013-11-27 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | PRIME M |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4928 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 51600 |
Lowest native ISO | 50 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Cross type focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 151 |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD monitor with brightness/color adjustment and AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.61x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync, Slow Sync+Redeye, Trailing Curtain Sync, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30,25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60,50,30,25,24 fps), 640 x 424 (30,25,24 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 225 grams (0.50 lbs) | 646 grams (1.42 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 130 x 97 x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 79 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.1 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1087 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 710 images |
Form of battery | - | AA |
Battery ID | - | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $300 | $600 |