Olympus 9000 vs Pentax K200D
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
61 Imaging
49 Features
41 Overall
45
Olympus 9000 vs Pentax K200D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched May 2009
- Alternative Name is mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 690g - 134 x 95 x 74mm
- Revealed September 2008
- Previous Model is Pentax K100D S
Olympus 9000 vs Pentax K200D Overview
The following is a in-depth review of the Olympus 9000 and Pentax K200D, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the 9000 (12MP) and the K200D (10MP) is relatively well matched but the 9000 (1/2.3") and K200D (APS-C) feature totally different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe 9000 was unveiled 9 months after the K200D so they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera and the Pentax K200D being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go through a detailed comparison, below is a short introduction of how the 9000 grades vs the K200D with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus 9000 vs Pentax K200D Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus 9000 & Pentax K200D. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus 9000 Gallery & Pentax K200D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Pentax K200D
9000 | K200D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2009 | September 2008 | Newer by 9 months |
Reasons to pick Pentax K200D over the Olympus 9000
K200D | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focus |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Pentax K200D
9000 | K200D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 2.7" | 2.7" | Identical screen measurements | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither has Touch screen |
Olympus 9000 vs Pentax K200D Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus 9000 has exterior dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Pentax K200D has measurements of 134mm x 95mm x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") accompanied by a weight of 690 grams (1.52 lbs).
Check the Olympus 9000 and Pentax K200D in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the 9000 versus the K200D.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 9000 and K200D is 92 and 61 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Pentax K200D Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to see the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reading through technical specs. The image here will give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the 9000 and K200D.
As you have seen, both of those cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The 9000 having a tinier sensor will make achieving shallower DOF harder and the Olympus 9000 will resolve extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more modern 9000 is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus 9000 vs Pentax K200D Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 9000 vs Pentax K200D Specifications
Olympus Stylus 9000 | Pentax K200D | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Pentax K200D |
Alternative name | mju 9000 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Launched | 2009-05-14 | 2008-09-01 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3872 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 50 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 151 |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | None |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 225g (0.50 lbs) | 690g (1.52 lbs) |
Dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 134 x 95 x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 64 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 561 |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $300 | $600 |