Olympus 9000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
Olympus 9000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched May 2009
- Also Known as mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Introduced September 2011
- Replaced the Ricoh GR Digital III
Olympus 9000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
Here, we will be looking at the Olympus 9000 and Ricoh GR Digital IV, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the 9000 (12MP) and the GR Digital IV (10MP) is pretty comparable but the 9000 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") boast different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe 9000 was brought out 3 years prior to the GR Digital IV which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the 9000 scores vs the GR Digital IV for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus 9000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus 9000 and Ricoh GR Digital IV. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus 9000 Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
9000 | GR Digital IV |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Olympus 9000
GR Digital IV | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2011 | May 2009 | Newer by 28 months | |
Manually focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1230k | 230k | Crisper screen (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
9000 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 9000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus 9000 features exterior measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Ricoh GR Digital IV has specifications of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus 9000 and Ricoh GR Digital IV in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you use at that moment. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the 9000 vs the GR Digital IV.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the 9000 and GR Digital IV is 92 and 92 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to picture the gap in sensor dimensions only by checking out a spec sheet. The image underneath should offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the 9000 and GR Digital IV.
Clearly, both the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The 9000 because of its smaller sensor is going to make shooting bokeh more difficult and the Olympus 9000 will show more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots way more aggressively. The more aged 9000 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus 9000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 9000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
Olympus Stylus 9000 | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
Otherwise known as | mju 9000 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2009-05-14 | 2011-09-15 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 50 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/1.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 1s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 225 gr (0.50 pounds) | 190 gr (0.42 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 390 photographs |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $300 | $599 |