Clicky

Olympus 9000 vs Ricoh WG-30

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29
Olympus Stylus 9000 front
 
Ricoh WG-30 front
Portability
91
Imaging
40
Features
34
Overall
37

Olympus 9000 vs Ricoh WG-30 Key Specs

Olympus 9000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 50 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
  • Released May 2009
  • Additionally Known as mju 9000
Ricoh WG-30
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
  • Launched October 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus 9000 vs Ricoh WG-30 Overview

Its time to look more closely at the Olympus 9000 vs Ricoh WG-30, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and WG-30 (16MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor size (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The 9000 was revealed 6 years earlier than the WG-30 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before delving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the 9000 grades vs the WG-30 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Ricoh WG-30

 9000 WG-30 

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Olympus 9000

 WG-30 9000 
LaunchedOctober 2014May 2009Newer by 65 months

Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Ricoh WG-30

 9000 WG-30 
Focus manually Lack of manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size2.7"2.7"Same screen size
Screen resolution230k230kEqual screen resolution
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch screen Neither features Touch screen

Olympus 9000 vs Ricoh WG-30 Physical Comparison

In case you're planning to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 9000 enjoys outside dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-30 has dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus 9000 vs Ricoh WG-30 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the 9000 vs the WG-30.

Olympus 9000 vs Ricoh WG-30 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the 9000 and WG-30 is 92 and 91 respectively.

Olympus 9000 vs Ricoh WG-30 top view buttons comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Ricoh WG-30 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is very difficult to see the difference between sensor dimensions just by reading through technical specs. The pic underneath will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the 9000 and WG-30.

As you can tell, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Ricoh WG-30 to give you more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more aged 9000 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus 9000 vs Ricoh WG-30 sensor size comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus 9000 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus 9000
Portrait photography with Ricoh WG-30
21
manual focus not available
no manual control
no external flash support
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
35
resolution is good (16MP)
supports face detect focus
lack of manual focus
no manual exposure
can't use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus 9000 as a Street photography camera
Ricoh WG-30 as a Street photography camera
53
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
heavier than average in class (225g)
61
image stabilization (Digital)
environment proofing
fixed screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus 9000 as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh WG-30 as a Sports photography camera
27
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority mode
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
45
image stabilization (Digital)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
supports tracking focus
environment proofing
continuous shooting slow (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus 9000
Travel photography with Ricoh WG-30
58
flash built-in
really wide (28mm)
great reach (280mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
heavier than average in class (225g)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.2)
71
environment proofing
resolution is good (16MP)
has built in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus 9000 Landscape photography factors
Ricoh WG-30 Landscape photography factors
32
really wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
manual focus not available
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
small screen (2.7 inches)
no manual control
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
missing Time Lapse recording
43
relatively wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
environment proofing
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
no manual exposure
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 9000 as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh WG-30 as a Vlogging camera
27
really wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
screen is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
missing mic socket
heavier than average in class (225g)
33
relatively wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
supports face detect focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
missing microphone socket
Photography Glossary

Olympus 9000 vs Ricoh WG-30 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus 9000 and Ricoh WG-30
 Olympus Stylus 9000Ricoh WG-30
General Information
Brand Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus Stylus 9000 Ricoh WG-30
Otherwise known as mju 9000 -
Type Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Released 2009-05-14 2014-10-09
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3968 x 2976 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 1600 6400
Minimum native ISO 50 125
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-280mm (10.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.2-5.9 f/3.5-5.5
Macro focusing distance 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.9 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.7 inches 2.7 inches
Display resolution 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 secs 4 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting rate - 1.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 5.00 m 3.90 m (Auto ISO)
Flash settings Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 225 grams (0.50 pounds) 192 grams (0.42 pounds)
Physical dimensions 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 300 pictures
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID - D-LI92
Self timer Yes (12 seconds) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal
Card slots 1 1
Retail pricing $300 $428